IngerMan
Apr 18, 09:40 PM
This is the place I thought was full of answers:cool: Should I check PC World:eek:
MacBytes
Oct 25, 03:31 PM
http://www.macbytes.com/images/bytessig.gif (http://www.macbytes.com)
Category: 3rd Party Hardware
Link: Jobs� PC Board Esthetics (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20101025163139)
Description:: How Steve is concerned with the esthetics of the PC board
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Category: 3rd Party Hardware
Link: Jobs� PC Board Esthetics (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20101025163139)
Description:: How Steve is concerned with the esthetics of the PC board
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
nitropowered
Feb 10, 07:15 PM
I called up CS (to talk about an unauthorized charge) and then the CS rep let me know of the Unlimited M2M plan. Switched it and it was rather painless.
If the website isn't working for you (like me), just call them up and they will do it quickly
If the website isn't working for you (like me), just call them up and they will do it quickly
Westside guy
Nov 11, 01:54 PM
I came across Launchbar when I was looking for a replacement to the quick-launcher I used to have in my Gnome panel (under Linux). This was a little box that you'd type a command in and it'd run - not quite as cool as Launchbar, but actually more flexible because you could type a one-line perl script etc. in addition to command names.
Then someone mentioned Quicksilver and I tried that. Quicksilver seems to be faster that Launchbar when it comes to indexing etc.
But the question is, will Quicksilver stay free? Maybe I'm just blind, but I haven't seen anything (and I've looked) that says Quicksilver is going to be a free app. Right now it's just in beta, and often beta means "free for now, until we get the quirks worked out".
Can anyone shed light on this for me? :confused:
Then someone mentioned Quicksilver and I tried that. Quicksilver seems to be faster that Launchbar when it comes to indexing etc.
But the question is, will Quicksilver stay free? Maybe I'm just blind, but I haven't seen anything (and I've looked) that says Quicksilver is going to be a free app. Right now it's just in beta, and often beta means "free for now, until we get the quirks worked out".
Can anyone shed light on this for me? :confused:
more...
shartypants
Apr 20, 03:36 PM
That's great, but I imagine that could change (assuming someone can build an android tablet cheaper than the iPad :D)
sinsin07
Apr 27, 07:08 PM
How many of the people who posted here negatively about this situation gone and deleted the file in question or downloaded the file that allows you to the tracking?
more...
Truffy
Nov 22, 03:00 PM
+ 1. The guy who sent this email undoubtedly sniffs his own farts.
HEY! WHAT'S WRONG WITH SNIFF...:o
HEY! WHAT'S WRONG WITH SNIFF...:o
Shigatsu
Apr 15, 12:27 PM
Here's mine.
more...
harry*333
Jun 2, 08:27 PM
this is my first planning on making two more :D
xi mezmerize ix
Feb 19, 05:51 AM
Mine switches between 2 every half hour. Big difference between last month: 26 switching every 15 minutes.
more...
kdarling
May 4, 09:16 PM
All of a sudden I'm getting this error, which causes my IE8 work PC to hang with Window Busy all the time:
Webpage error details
User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MS-RTC LM 8)
Timestamp: Thu, 5 May 2011 02:02:38 UTC
Message: Could not complete the operation due to error 800a03e8.
Line: 11
Char: 1
Code: 0
URI: http://files.netshelter.net/js/k_extract.js
Webpage error details
User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MS-RTC LM 8)
Timestamp: Thu, 5 May 2011 02:02:38 UTC
Message: Could not complete the operation due to error 800a03e8.
Line: 11
Char: 1
Code: 0
URI: http://files.netshelter.net/js/k_extract.js
nipo
Apr 4, 10:12 AM
Does ATT offer lower off contract prices like T-mobile? You're only saving $150 off the no contract price with the change.
more...
maclaptop
Apr 13, 07:56 PM
Dec 23rd 2011
benthewraith
Aug 6, 09:34 AM
http://a.imageshack.us/img836/2415/screenshot20100806at103.png
more...
Hilmi Hamidi
Feb 13, 06:52 AM
http://img266.imagevenue.com/loc256/th_00899_Untitled_122_256lo.jpg (http://img266.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=00899_Untitled_122_256lo.jpg)
DirtySocks85
Apr 7, 10:54 AM
Negative votes on this? Seriously? So what if they're breaking the jailbreak, they're allowed to do so.
And we're allowed to vote negative if we don't like this. Generally speaking in terms of iOS "security fixes" also means "closing holes used for jailbreak exploits". I'm all for closing holes like the ones that allowed the jailbreakme.com jailbreaks via Safari, but most of the holes used by JBers require the user to do some very specific things (like putting the phone into DFU mode). These aren't a threat to the average user.
I have a 10gig weekly download limit at school and having to download a 600mb update every week for my iPod is annoying.
No one is making you update.
And we're allowed to vote negative if we don't like this. Generally speaking in terms of iOS "security fixes" also means "closing holes used for jailbreak exploits". I'm all for closing holes like the ones that allowed the jailbreakme.com jailbreaks via Safari, but most of the holes used by JBers require the user to do some very specific things (like putting the phone into DFU mode). These aren't a threat to the average user.
I have a 10gig weekly download limit at school and having to download a 600mb update every week for my iPod is annoying.
No one is making you update.
more...
tinman0
Apr 29, 04:23 AM
Yeah not going to hurt samgsung on bit.
Apple needs Samsung more than Samsung needs Apple.
Reason being is the parts Samsung is supply there is already a shortage of them on the market. Apple drops them all Samsung does is go to the next guy and more than likely for more money.
Apple on the other hand will struggle to find a new supplier.
Don't be daft, Samsung are the suppliers because they gave the best price.
Samsung will also be locked into supply contracts anyway, and they interfered with them, Samsung would be in a world of hurt, not just from Apple and litigation, but every other company they supply.
And don't you believe there aren't alternatives for Apples component supplies either - every company that can build something that Samsung already does has been on the phone this week to Apple.
The end result in all of this is that Samsung are putting at risk an $8bn turnover for copying a customers phone design.
Even if Samsung win any of these suits, Samsung will lose the $8bn turnover, and will hand their component rivals the same amount.
The question at the end of the day is whether the Galaxy/Tab/S/S2 are really worth $8bn a year - which they aren't.
So who loses? Samsung every time.
Heres the clue - never sue your customer.
Apple needs Samsung more than Samsung needs Apple.
Reason being is the parts Samsung is supply there is already a shortage of them on the market. Apple drops them all Samsung does is go to the next guy and more than likely for more money.
Apple on the other hand will struggle to find a new supplier.
Don't be daft, Samsung are the suppliers because they gave the best price.
Samsung will also be locked into supply contracts anyway, and they interfered with them, Samsung would be in a world of hurt, not just from Apple and litigation, but every other company they supply.
And don't you believe there aren't alternatives for Apples component supplies either - every company that can build something that Samsung already does has been on the phone this week to Apple.
The end result in all of this is that Samsung are putting at risk an $8bn turnover for copying a customers phone design.
Even if Samsung win any of these suits, Samsung will lose the $8bn turnover, and will hand their component rivals the same amount.
The question at the end of the day is whether the Galaxy/Tab/S/S2 are really worth $8bn a year - which they aren't.
So who loses? Samsung every time.
Heres the clue - never sue your customer.
DrumApple
Apr 28, 11:47 AM
What, did Apple think that Verizon customers would warmly welcome someone who shunned them for 4 years? The customer is most important, shouldn'thave signed that exclusive contract with AT&T... relly stunted their growth in the CDMA market, people move on too...
iStudentUK
May 4, 08:05 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)
There was talk if waterboarding providing some intell, but this is now in serious doubt.
Torture and inhumane treatment is unacceptable (even if you call it enhanced interrogation). The US should adopt something equivalent to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It prohibits torture in ANY circumstance, it is an absolute right.
No matter the situation, even in the ticking bomb thought experiment, torture should not be used.
There was talk if waterboarding providing some intell, but this is now in serious doubt.
Torture and inhumane treatment is unacceptable (even if you call it enhanced interrogation). The US should adopt something equivalent to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It prohibits torture in ANY circumstance, it is an absolute right.
No matter the situation, even in the ticking bomb thought experiment, torture should not be used.
TheOnlyJon
Oct 1, 02:18 PM
http://i56.tinypic.com/2dc5tzc.png
GREAT album.
GREAT album.
Rychy
Oct 18, 10:22 AM
I plan on showing up around 5:30... do the stores do anything that these launch "events"?
dmmcintyre3
Dec 24, 04:46 PM
I know I'm getting:
4 GB RAM chip for my MBP (5gb total)
PS3 and a few games
4 GB RAM chip for my MBP (5gb total)
PS3 and a few games
ChrisA
Oct 5, 06:51 PM
This is my first post. It takes a lot for me to stop being a lurker, but the idea that any user can resize a textarea on a site I design, dynamically redrawing the page, is among the dumbest ideas I've ever heard. This will break valid page layouts in new and unheard of ways. Designers make form elements a size and shape for a reason.
Web designers will just have to become more sophisticated. They will have to learn to work with relative units. For example a button size should be specified as "m times the lenght of this string in the current user specified font" and a image size rather then being fixed might be "80% in the frames width as set by the user
We should get back to the way HTML markup is envisioned. The author tags the test by functions like "title" or "larger" and the browser descides how to display it
Web designers will just have to become more sophisticated. They will have to learn to work with relative units. For example a button size should be specified as "m times the lenght of this string in the current user specified font" and a image size rather then being fixed might be "80% in the frames width as set by the user
We should get back to the way HTML markup is envisioned. The author tags the test by functions like "title" or "larger" and the browser descides how to display it
lewis82
Dec 1, 06:10 PM
262495
As always, courtesy of interfacelift.com :)
As always, courtesy of interfacelift.com :)
No comments:
Post a Comment