Friday, June 10, 2011

stupid tattoo

images Stupid tattoos stupid tattoo. Stupid Tattoos 2/Stupid
  • Stupid Tattoos 2/Stupid


  • Totoro
    05-08 11:25 PM
    That's the point.

    I was denied ever $1 stimulus payment for 1 joint filer (spouse) being ITIN holder and from the way things are going it would not happen by 2008 either. If not $1500 why they denied even $1500- $600(for the ITIN filer) = $900 ? Why shouldn't i get at least $900 ....??

    I wrote to her around 9:30 EST - dont know if she is done by now. I have given my cell phone number as well in the email. I can write and talk as much as possible against this 'ridiculuous' and 'unfair' mandate/rule :mad:

    I am always wary of an email asking for personal information. I sent her an email and asked for her to reply with a telephone number to call. I have heard nothing back. She looks legit, but I need to be sure. I did the same with the San Jose reporter and he sent me his phone number. So that was fine.




    wallpaper Stupid Tattoos 2/Stupid stupid tattoo. This may be a dumb tattoo,
  • This may be a dumb tattoo,


  • go_guy123
    05-30 11:56 AM
    While doing some ad-hoc research after watching Valkyrie, I discovered this interesting bit of U.S. immigration history and couldn't help but be amazed how nobody seems to know or talk about United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Bhagat_Singh_Thind).

    The Luce-Celler Act of 1946 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luce-Celler_Act_of_1946) was proposed by Republican Clare Booth Luce and Democrat Emanuel Celler in 1943 and signed into being by President Harry Truman on July 2, 1946, granting naturalization rights to Indian Americans (and Filipino Americans) and re-established immigration from India (and the Philippines).

    Food for thought...

    jazz

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

    Eventually this bill introduced that 7% per country cap




    stupid tattoo. stupid tattoo eh?
  • stupid tattoo eh?


  • jliechty
    November 17th, 2004, 08:17 PM
    Bounce flash is a good idea, but you need 1) a powerful flash, and 2) to keep a good distance from the subject. If you get too close, as I painfully learned from a few rolls of slide film shot over recent trips to visit family, the flash goes up to the ceiling, and comes straight down again, leaving eyes in soft but ugly shadow (fortunately, the rest of the photo was well exposed, so I think it can be rescued in PS).

    Flash photography is a lot of complexity for a beginner (I feel like a total newbie at flash, and I think I'm not doing too badly on basic exposure of ambient light with a few years' practice), and even modern ?-TTL flash can screw up if used without the photographer's thought or intervention, though probably not as much as the old-style auto flash that I'm using. Of course, there's an almost foolproof way to do flash - using guide numbers - but who wants to spend ten minutes digging for the calculator to figure out flash exposure for each shot, and then being stuck with one aperture dictated by flash power and subject distance?




    2011 This may be a dumb tattoo, stupid tattoo. Tattoos are retarded
  • Tattoos are retarded


  • ganam
    02-21 08:57 PM
    Yes. It is possible to do H1 Transfer and use AC21 without disrupting the GC process.

    Please go to

    http://www.murthy.com/news/n_nuacp2.html

    and see Question 11. Do I have to use an EAD to use AC21?



    more...

    stupid tattoo. Week – Stupid Tattoo Guy
  • Week – Stupid Tattoo Guy


  • arunoman
    04-10 02:41 AM
    Check with your attorney probably you can appeal to re open your case if you are sure that you have responded to the RFE "on time". Its very much possible.




    stupid tattoo. STUPID IS WHAT STUPID TATTOOS
  • STUPID IS WHAT STUPID TATTOOS


  • gc_on_demand
    04-30 03:01 PM
    Comprehensive Immigration Reform in 2009, Can We Do It and How?� is live now.

    Here is link. Will some body hear it and post the updates?

    http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=3793


    Thanks in advance.

    Alan Greenspan is talking about H1b and other highly skilled immigrant's issues. Also mentioned about Housing Crisis.



    more...

    stupid tattoo. /gallery/stupid-tattoos/
  • /gallery/stupid-tattoos/


  • bhavingreat
    09-22 05:09 PM
    hi,
    Thank you all for your reply.

    I have no intension of leaving the company, the mgmt is asking me to take the pay cut at this time and they will pay me back after 1 year. so i don't see any issues like they are not willing to pay or anything. I was just trying to get an idea whether this might effect on the green card or not? like, you should get the salary mentioned on file atleast for next 6 month.

    Thank you again for all replies.




    2010 stupid tattoo eh? stupid tattoo. Stupid tattoos
  • Stupid tattoos


  • dan19
    02-20 10:30 AM
    Hello all,

    My I-140 (EB3) is already approved through my present company.

    I am about to start the 6th year (final year) of my H1 soon. I want to change my job and apply through EB2 as EB3 has almost stopped moving.

    My case is like this:
    PD: 2002-Oct India/ROW
    Category: EB3
    H1 (6 year ends): June 2008

    My questions are:

    1. First and foremost - can I change my job as I am entering the 6th year of H1?

    2. Since it's going to be my 6th year, will I need to reapply for labor as soon as I change my job? Is there any timeframe?

    3. Will there be any issue porting the Priority Date - especially since I am planning to apply on EB2 in the next job.


    Thanks,
    Dan



    more...

    stupid tattoo. Print Stupid Tattoo Gallery 1
  • Print Stupid Tattoo Gallery 1


  • gangster
    07-17 12:14 AM
    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jul2007/db20070716_514499.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index _businessweek+exclusives

    Latest article says Protests pay off.

    Way to go IV!!!!




    hair Tattoos are retarded stupid tattoo. Print Stupid Tattoo Gallery 12
  • Print Stupid Tattoo Gallery 12


  • waitingonlc
    02-13 03:50 PM
    Immigration plan looms in Congress
    By Michelle Mittelstadt
    The Dallas Morning News, February 12, 2006
    http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/nation/stories/DN-immigdog_12nat.ART0.State.Edition1.3eb24c4.html

    Washington -- As mid-term congressional elections draw closer, the window for action in Congress on a complex � and controversial � immigration package grows ever smaller.

    Mindful of that, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has told Senate leaders that they must deliver a bill to the floor by March 27, an ambitious deadline for legislation that has yet to be written in committee.

    A bigger hurdle looms: Reconciling sure-to-be competing visions from the House and Senate.

    'Immigration is one of the most controversial issues in American society,' said Stephen Yale-Loehr, who teaches immigration law at Cornell University. 'We all like individual immigrants who live near us and work with us, but we don't like illegal immigration as a whole. And trying to put together a package that will accommodate everyone's interest is very tough, indeed.'

    The topic is fraught with economic, national security, social, diplomatic and political implications.

    Each year, hundreds of thousands of immigrants enter the U.S. illegally, swelling a population now estimated to exceed 11 million. The Southwest border is in crisis in places, overrun by illegal immigration and drug traffickers. There is also the threat that the porous border could serve as a gateway for terrorists. And the legal immigration system is beset by backlogs, problems and rules that vex employers and keep millions of people awaiting approval for green cards to join relatives already here.

    The test for Congress is what to emphasize: enforcement, immigration liberalization or some combination of the two?

    Choosing a direction

    The House took the first crack at the question, passing a stringent enforcement-only bill that would fence more than a third of the 1,952-mile Southwest border, increase fines for employers who hire illegal immigrants, and make it a crime (instead of a civil penalty) to be in the country illegally. The legislation was silent on President Bush's call for a guest worker program that would grant visas for up to six years to millions of undocumented workers.

    The debate now shifts to the Senate, which appears inclined to marry enhanced border security with a temporary worker program.

    But the Senate's solution, particularly if it includes a pathway to legal permanent residence, is sure to set up a collision with the House, where national security hawks have dominated the debate.

    'The big question becomes: Is it even possible for the two houses to reconcile their bills,' said Steven Camarota, research director for the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors reduced immigration. 'If it's not done by May, I can't see it getting done.'

    The divisions may be too pronounced for Congress to act this year, Mr. Yale-Loehr said.

    As the elections near, politicians will become increasingly skittish of taking up an issue that could anger Hispanic and conservative voters alike while also inflaming constituencies as diverse as big business and labor.

    In some ways, it's no surprise that politicians are lurching in radically different directions, with one faction pushing get-tough prescriptions such as ending automatic citizenship to those born here of illegal immigrant parents, while another camp presses to legalize illegal immigrants and permit a stream of newcomers.

    Public divided

    The public is deeply conflicted.

    Polls consistently show that Americans are troubled by illegal immigration and the federal government's failure to enforce the law. But those same polls also detect sympathy for illegal immigrants who work and pay taxes as they scrabble for a piece of the American dream.

    A new Time/SRBI poll offered one snapshot of the public's ambivalence. Though 63 percent of respondents described illegal immigration as a very serious or extremely serious problem and 57 percent endorsed taking 'whatever steps are necessary' to halt migrant crossings, 73 percent favored granting temporary work visas to illegal immigrants already here.

    So, how do policymakers thread the needle?

    'That's the $64 million question,' said Migration Policy Institute senior fellow Doris Meissner, who headed the Immigration and Naturalization Service during the Clinton administration.

    'We definitely have to do something, and sooner than later,' she said. 'But I think that it's really important that this issue and this debate develops and evolves, because if we were to go ahead and enact what's now been passed by the House, it would be a terrible disservice.'

    She, like others critical of the House's enforcement-only approach, contends that any immigration law rewrite must resolve the status of illegal immigrants and provide an outlet for future migrants drawn by jobs or the desire to be reunited with family.

    'Enforcement-only is not going to work,' said Angelo Amador, head of immigration policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

    The chamber is loosely allied with immigrant-rights groups, religious organizations, labor unions and others who have rallied around a plan by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., that tandems some tougher enforcement with a guest worker plan that would provide a path to legal permanent residence.

    But supporters of the House approach say enforcement must be dealt with first, both at the border and within the country, and by implementing a mandatory employer verification system to check the legal status of would-be hires.

    'A guest worker program would be an absolute disaster with our current enforcement because, of course, it wouldn't be a guest worker program if we can't make them go home,' said Rosemary Jenks, director of government relations for Numbers USA, a group seeking reduced immigration.

    Pollster Sergio Bendixen said that the policy debate has been skewed by the 'echo chamber' of radio talk shows and cable TV programs that fixate on immigration's negatives rather than looking at the whole picture.

    'It has become an emotional issue with emotional buzzwords, and there's very little rationality in the debate,' Mr. Bendixen said. 'Unfortunately, we are close to making it impossible on people who have to get elected' to deal with the issue.



    more...

    stupid tattoo. Re: Stupid Tattoos
  • Re: Stupid Tattoos


  • ak_2006
    04-30 03:05 PM
    Thanks GC_ON_DEMAND for the quick update.




    hot Week – Stupid Tattoo Guy stupid tattoo. Stupid Tattoo Gallery
  • Stupid Tattoo Gallery


  • days_go_by
    08-19 11:22 AM
    What impact does premium processing have on your application, if your file is stuck in Dallas BEC for over 3 1/2 years? Does this mean the application will be processed faster now?! Or is this only for new applicants?:(
    -----
    140 premium has nothing to do with BEC labor processing. Labor processing will not speed up because of this. THis is a very calcualted move by USCIS, they are trying to speed up processing of EB3 140, but it helps noone, not Indians, Chinese or even Rest of the world.
    In fact this migh even hurt us a little more if they stop concurrent processing.



    more...

    house Stupid Tattoo Gallery 3 stupid tattoo. Tattoo WTF. April 24, 2010
  • Tattoo WTF. April 24, 2010


  • LC2002
    04-14 11:06 AM
    Congratulations..

    Thank You!




    tattoo STUPID IS WHAT STUPID TATTOOS stupid tattoo. Stupid Tattoos
  • Stupid Tattoos


  • lazycis
    09-17 09:59 AM
    You can start working for other company only 180 days after receipt date for your I-485. The job has to be same or similar (profession-wise). If you are planning to change companies, it's better to do it before you get your GC, rather than immediately after.



    more...

    pictures /gallery/stupid-tattoos/ stupid tattoo. I went the stupid tattoo route
  • I went the stupid tattoo route


  • Eb3Pro
    01-25 11:03 AM
    Hello everyone,
    I went online to check the status of my I-485 and it displayed me the following message

    Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS

    Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.

    On December 19, 2007 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.


    What does it mean? Does it mean that I-485 is approved.

    Pls guide.

    Kapil

    I got similar message on my 485. in my case they resent response to SR to my new address. This is more likely change of address issue.
    if you(or lawyer) have not changed address then contact USCIS.




    dresses Stupid Tattoo Gallery stupid tattoo. Stupid Tattoo Gallery 8
  • Stupid Tattoo Gallery 8


  • srikondoji
    04-26 07:50 PM
    Berkeleybee
    Done editing my blog.
    Thanks for correcting my blog.

    I will also post a textual link on my online party invitation website where several indians visit and send their party invitations.
    Currently there are 2 indian families celebrating housewarming party using my website with close to 75 guests and i have several email id's who in the past have used my website.
    I hope i atleast get the attention of few indians to this website and our cause.
    Thanks again for the hardwork.
    sri



    more...

    makeup Print Stupid Tattoo Gallery 1 stupid tattoo. Stupid Tattoo Gallery 3
  • Stupid Tattoo Gallery 3


  • andhrawala
    08-22 09:17 AM
    Hi overseas,

    I am in the same dilemma as you. I am in OH and according to my jurisdiction I have to apply in Nebraska Service center. Now, my I-485 application has been transferred to Texas.
    I called the uscis customer service and they said to file in Texas as my 485 is pending there.

    So, I am really confused here. Any help will be greatly appreciated



    Labor Priority Date: EB2 - 2007 April - India
    I-140 Applied: 05/15/2007
    I-140 Approved: 08/10/2009
    I-485 Applied: 07/26/2007
    I-485 Status: Pending




    girlfriend Stupid Tattoos stupid tattoo. Strange and Stupid Tattoos
  • Strange and Stupid Tattoos


  • logiclife
    07-21 02:57 PM
    The name of the lawyer we have talked to before is Joe Hohenstein.

    See more details here: http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1088




    hairstyles Re: Stupid Tattoos stupid tattoo. Ugly freaking tattoo
  • Ugly freaking tattoo


  • saibabu_d
    08-03 10:06 PM
    lin0722554234
    LIN -> Nebraska
    07 -> Year in 2 digits
    225 -> Number of working days since October 1 2006
    5 -> Default for all electronic data
    4234 -> Serial number for the receipts issued on that day starting with 0001.




    kanshul
    02-01 10:08 AM
    Honestly you are not in very good shape. You can't use AC21 so can't port your GC.

    If your old employer withdraws your 140 (which many small firms do) you won't get to retain your PD. Now some lawyers think you may retain your PD but it is debatable.

    Also, if you file your GC through a respectable non H1B dependent firm and your case does not go for audit, you will get labor + 140 within a year. Else it may take 3+ years.




    gc28262
    11-05 04:45 PM
    If she plans to continue with her current employer after her travel, there is no harm in using AP. Once she comes back on AP, she automatically resumes her H1B status on the next H1B extension filing within US.

    If she is OK with going through the hassles of visa stamping, that is fine too.

    Please refer to the following murthy bulletin for details.

    http://www.murthy.com/mb_pdf/032108_P.html



    No comments:

    Post a Comment