Thursday, June 9, 2011

slabs on swangas

images SKY HI ENT #39;#39;SLABS IN DA slabs on swangas. Slabs and Swangers 3 (Texas
  • Slabs and Swangers 3 (Texas



  • pappu
    06-03 12:47 PM
    Good job Pratik. we should grab every opportunity we get to voice our opinion even though this TV interview was mostly on H1B visa cap and increasing the cap. Only 10 seconds or so were given to the lengthy green card process. Increasing H1B quota is not a solution for us. It would infact increase our wait times and backlog of applications. it is in the interest of Hi-tech companies to have the h1b visa quota increased so that they can get more skilled workers. However they know that once they have an H1B worker, they will have that worker for many years due to retrogression. Thus retrogression is not a BIG news story. We need to highlight the greencard quota issue and not confuse it with the H1B quota issue. I feel these are 2 different things. After watching the SJC and Senate proceedings I feel Retrogression and greencard quota issue needs more awareness and education amongst lawmakers so that it is not confused with H1B visa quota.





    wallpaper Slabs and Swangers 3 (Texas slabs on swangas. slabs on 84s Pictures,
  • slabs on 84s Pictures,



  • a1b2c3
    09-25 01:34 AM
    If you need to retain your PD, does the job description need to be similar or can it be different?

    Mine is a similar case, I-140 is approved and would like to switch employers on 3 year H1 extension....

    My question is can I file for labor through PERM with the new company even if it is in different category and previous I-140 is revoked (worst case, maybe even realistic scenario)? What can my original company do to stop this H1 transfer/filing of new labor from happening?:confused:





    slabs on swangas. slab swangas seville coupe
  • slab swangas seville coupe



  • gcwait2007
    02-15 11:48 AM
    I am in similar situation. I have received EAD and AP but planning to move on, using H1-B transfer.

    If I use H1-B transfer, have I to ask my new employer to do PERM again and then I-140??

    Or

    Is it just enough to send a AC-21 letter to USCIS that I chnaged to a new job which is similar to the one for which I got PERM & I-140 approval.

    Please advise.





    2011 slabs on 84s Pictures, slabs on swangas. slabs on swangas. post pix of
  • slabs on swangas. post pix of



  • sprash
    03-08 11:49 AM
    My PD of JAN 27 05 became current with the March bulletin. While folks from TSC got GCs from March 2nd itself, NSC seemed to have little action.

    By some random combination of POJ options, which changed recently, I managed to get a service request in on March 2nd (Type of service requested: -- Outside Normal Processing Times). The same day, I had Infopass and I was told its been "Preadjudicated, under review" and there was some recent movement on my case (transfered internally). This got my spirits up, but in just 2 days, I got a pretty horrible response to my SR, which made me feel this is going to be an uphill battle:

    Due to the pending caseload at the Nebraska Service Center, the processing time of your I-485 application has been extended. Allow extra time for an Officer to review your application. Furthermore, if all initial evidence was not included with you application, or a question arose during adjudication that required a Request for Evidence, additional time would be needed.

    Your application remains awaiting review by an Officer and you will be notified as soon as a decision is made. The Service is waiting for VISA availability.

    If you have any further questions, please call the National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283.

    I was about to contact the state senator today, but early today morning we got our CPO emails.

    My case is pretty straight forward:
    Processing center: NSC
    PD: JAN 27 2005 non perm which got approved just in time for July 07 fiasco.
    I-485: July 07 filer
    RFE in Nov 2008 (immunizations for wife, she had taken certain waivers due to pregnancy --- and Employment verification for myself)
    Approval: Today (March 8th 2010)



    more...


    slabs on swangas. Peep The Kandy Slab on 17 inch
  • Peep The Kandy Slab on 17 inch



  • jasmin45
    07-16 07:01 PM
    It was worth a try. Oh well !
    Its a crime to influence someone at position to have access to information systems and distribute the data without written permission from the organization.

    Both the parties can be prosecuted for this crime..you for soliciting the information for which you have no authority to receive except following proper protocol





    slabs on swangas. SWANGAS 24#39;S BLADES
  • SWANGAS 24#39;S BLADES



  • GCBy3000
    09-09 08:49 AM
    Add you have to be logged in message somewhere in the top. Many members does not know that they have to be logged in to participate in the poll.

    Please respond so that we can get an idea of the distribution of EB cases. Thanks to MrWaitingGC for the initiative.



    more...


    slabs on swangas. slabs on swangas. White Camaro on 24#39;#39; by CAREX; White Camaro on 24#39;#39; by CAREX. zombierunner. May 2, 10:06 PM
  • slabs on swangas. White Camaro on 24#39;#39; by CAREX; White Camaro on 24#39;#39; by CAREX. zombierunner. May 2, 10:06 PM



  • chanduv23
    10-09 02:35 PM
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^





    2010 slab swangas seville coupe slabs on swangas. SKY HI ENT #39;#39;SLABS IN DA
  • SKY HI ENT #39;#39;SLABS IN DA



  • VSS2007
    05-28 07:54 AM
    Hi

    Please someone share the info who already received their EAD. (Renewed)

    Does new EAD start after expiry of first one? or not?

    Thanks



    more...


    slabs on swangas. More swangas
  • More swangas



  • dpp
    02-12 12:35 PM
    It is only either Nebraska or Texas now. No other centers process I-140. For Texas center, it is appx 1 to 3 months. But for Nebraska, it is anytime from 6 - 9 months.





    hair slabs on swangas. post pix of slabs on swangas. Vogues (riding on swangas)
  • Vogues (riding on swangas)



  • narendra_modi
    03-04 03:45 PM
    Hi guys,
    this is my first post, so please bear with me ..How can a novice know that this forum is for EB category ? small suggestion to iv team, a small iv admin fix...

    can typing immigrationvoice.org take us all to "ebimmigrationvoice.org" or eb-legal-immigrationvoice.org" ? (eg. ibnlive.com takes you to ibnlive.in.com) In that way eventually everybody will know its a eb immigration voice and no other legal immigrants forums..

    Sr members, please share your views on this topic..

    thanks
    narendra



    more...


    slabs on swangas. slabs on swangas. sitting on
  • slabs on swangas. sitting on



  • IN2US
    07-27 12:16 PM
    Congratulations :)





    hot Peep The Kandy Slab on 17 inch slabs on swangas. swangas Pictures,
  • swangas Pictures,



  • martinvisalaw
    07-28 11:02 AM
    I still have 2 weeks before I leave for my trip, now is it advisable to apply for another AP this week and wait for it to come? Will that application make my current AP invalid?

    From what I understand, you need to be here in the US while you apply for your AP, but can travel on your older AP while this one is still in process. Is this correct?

    Is there a chance for AP denial, and how does that affect the chance of an AP extension in Future?

    You cannot enter the US on Advance Parole (AP) unless you had that specific AP when you left. So you cannot apply for AP now, leave the US, have someone send the approved AP to you in India, and use that AP to return to the US next year..

    There is always a slight chance that the AP will be denied. However that should not affect your chances of getting a new AP in the future.



    more...


    house I LOVE THIS SLAB SHYT AND IF U slabs on swangas. image
  • image



  • memyselfandus
    06-03 08:59 AM
    Since i had to spend US $ 70 on passportport photos during july 2007 filing, i wrote my own app to format passport photos. some of my my friends and i used it for filing AP the last couple years. i can email it to any of you if you want it. just PM me.
    you would need .NET framework(minimum version 2.0) to run it.
    it supports indian passport photos too (3.5 cm by 4.5 cm) :)

    I have used this site to generate several times.





    tattoo SWANGAS 24#39;S BLADES slabs on swangas. post pix of slabs
  • post pix of slabs



  • milind70
    10-15 10:45 AM
    Hello Gurus,
    I am EB3 India with PD September 2002.

    After all these years of endless waiting I am called for
    an interview at the local office in Philadelphia
    in Nov 26th 2007.

    Here are my details:
    Labour Applied: September 2002
    Labour approved: September 2003
    I-140/I-485 Applied: April 2004
    I-140 Pproved: August 2004
    Got married: August 2005
    Applied I-485 for Wife: June 2007
    Current Status of Wife: H1-B
    Countelss EADs and APs for me and a recent EAD approval
    for my wife with her AP still pending and status is still H1-B.

    In the beginning of this year, I resigned from the
    company who was the original sponsorer of my GC.
    I then started contracting on hourly basis and worked for
    a decent hourly rate for the first half of this year.
    Finally I got a full time offer with decent salary and
    benefits and took the job. I started working for this
    job - remotely and also took up another contracting job
    on an hourly basis (Got greedy as I waited too long :-))
    and started working on both these jobs.
    The point is - it is a different technology and not even
    remotely connected to my original job where my Labour
    cert was applied and approved. I was a developer
    back then and with all the experience, I couldn't
    continue as the pay was too low and no growth at all.

    I can have a letter of future employment that
    states that I have on offer in the same technology
    in which my original labour was applied and approved
    and that is not a problem at all.

    Please advise me on how to go about it. I can
    afford to pay and take the best attorney with me
    to the interview - some one who is very well known in
    the Philadelphia area.

    Any inputs/advise are really appreciated.

    IMP: Icing on the cake - my PD was mentioned wrong in
    the interview notice - it says april 2004 !!
    That was when my i-140 was applied and not labour.
    My labour was applied in September 2002 !!!
    Advise on this is also appreciated.

    Thanks a lot.

    I think you should be fine, just be confident dont waiver in interview.
    Stick to what is on paper.
    Regarding your PD it is of utmost importance that you get it corrected now
    than later, I had a friend who had a PD of May 2001 but his PD was detrmined to be may 2004 his attorney raised a query and got it corrected.
    I think in your case because have put your 140 date as PD since PD is usually determined at 140 stage and u have filed concurrently,make sure you bring this upto the notice of USCIS and get it corrected .



    more...


    pictures slabs on swangas. White Camaro on 24#39;#39; by CAREX; White Camaro on 24#39;#39; by CAREX. zombierunner. May 2, 10:06 PM slabs on swangas. My swangas i bought from OHIO,
  • My swangas i bought from OHIO,



  • a_yaja
    08-07 06:19 PM
    From the information that you have provided, I can tell you that their argument does not hold any water. The same can be said of H1B as well. If they are tracking expiration of H1B, they certainly can do the same for EAD.

    Hi,

    Iam trying to explain my employer that it's ok to hire employees with EAD. For some reason they prefer GC or Citizen only. I referred them to the Discrimination clause on I-9 form. Then they told me about their problems hiring EAD.

    1) If the Employee is hired on a valid EAD and later during the course of employment the EAD expired, there is no system in place for them to check back with the employee if (s)he has renewed it in a timely manner.

    2) If such an employee that has not renewed their EAD and continued their employment beyond expiration without notifying the employer, the company is worried that they may be legally liable for harboring employees with illegal statuses.


    Please help me understand if their concerns are valid and if not what is the remedy.





    dresses swangas Pictures, slabs on swangas. Re: Texas niggaz and they
  • Re: Texas niggaz and they



  • wellwishergc
    03-01 04:15 PM
    Logiclife,

    That makes perfect sense.

    My question is - Is it possible that all clauses related to illegal immigration will be striked off, while legal will go through? To my understanding, the main objective of this bill is to solve the issue of illegal immigration. Legal immigration is just an additional section.. My fear again is - will the whole bill be discarded just because of the contentious illegal immigration aspects in the bill?.. Is there a way to pass the legal immigration relief measures without a bill?.. something like an amendment to the existing law?

    Thanks for taking the interest and posting the comment.

    What you mean is change the content of the webfax,not the format.

    Anyways, the current draft of Specter bill would lead to numbers flowing downward(unused numbers due to 7% or 10% per country limit). When they flow downwards from EB2, EB3 and EB4, they go to EB5 where there is no mention of per country limit(by omission).

    You know what this means? After all the gains, the country limit on India and China will cause the overflow of all visa numbers to EB5(Unskilled labor, gardeners, cooks, maids) WHERE THERE IS NOT COUNTRY LIMIT and unlimited demand. And over there, in absence of no country limit, immigrants from Mexico will consume all EB5 unskilled numbers and there wont be anything like "UNUSED" numbers.(read the thread posted by STUCKLABOR for that analysis and legalese. : http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=241 )

    Coming back to proposals of Specter, the idea that there is so much relief that we dont need to worry about this or that...here is the thing...Current markup is a proposal. Not even a final version of Judiciary committee markup. From there you lose some things when it goes to the full floor of senate and then A LOT OF THINGS when the hawks from the HOUSE of REPS like Tancredos and Smiths slither their tentacles on the Senate version in the CONFERENCE COMMITTEE. That's the reason we dont want to lose one thing even if we are gaining 10 things because those 10 things might be reduced to 2 by the time its negotiated in the conference committee between the house and the senate.

    However, if you want to provide more input on this issue, you are most welcome to email Sandeep who is leading the content-prep team that writes these webfaxes and letters. His email is sandeep@immigrationvoice.org

    Thanks for taking interesting and sharing your view.

    --logiclife.



    more...


    makeup More swangas slabs on swangas. I LOVE THIS SLAB SHYT AND IF U
  • I LOVE THIS SLAB SHYT AND IF U



  • sidshar
    05-15 03:37 PM
    I got my GC last year auguest but her gc/485 status is stil pending. Is it even possible based on her case was dependent on me? What can I do abt it. Thanks.





    girlfriend post pix of slabs slabs on swangas. Cameos, slabs, and having
  • Cameos, slabs, and having



  • gc_chahiye
    09-20 05:55 PM
    The best thing for them to do or what they should have done is after 140 approval, they should accept 485 and process and keep it ready for date to become current. When current , they should mail the GC that month.

    I dont understand the reason of why they want to accept when current only ?


    because the law says so:

    From the Immigration and Nationality Act's Section 245(a):

    (a)--Status as Person Admitted for Permanent Residence on Application and Eligibility for Immigrant Status

    The status of an alien who was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States or the status of any other alien having an approved petition for classification under subparagraph (A)(iii), (A)(iv), (B)(ii), or (B)(iii) of section 204(a)(1) or may be adjusted by the Attorney General, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if (1) the alien makes an application for such adjustment, (2) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence, and (3) an immigrant visa is immediately available to him at the time his application is filed.


    This was also brought up at the time of the July bulletin reversal and in the past was one of teh things that IV was hoping to get changed through legislation.





    hairstyles slabs on swangas. sitting on slabs on swangas. Swangin
  • Swangin



  • plassey
    08-04 07:06 AM
    If what u r saying is correct then I consider you a man of great intelligence, this is truly remarkable.
    lin0722554234
    LIN -> Nebraska
    07 -> Year in 2 digits
    225 -> Number of working days since October 1 2006
    5 -> Default for all electronic data
    4234 -> Serial number for the receipts issued on that day starting with 0001.





    ilikekilo
    09-17 04:04 PM
    u pushed it a bit too mcuh,,,but its ok,....not biggy.who knows some people might have been encouraged





    ravi.shah
    01-28 11:34 AM
    Check out some of the reactions (article as well as the comments) to the President's call for Immigration reform!

    Obama makes H-1B, Green Card reform a priority - Computerworld Blogs (http://blogs.computerworld.com/17722/obama_makes_h_1b_green_card_reform_a_priority)

    Awareness is increasing.... and realisation is happening..
    Hopefully something materializes soon !!!:)



    No comments:

    Post a Comment