Sunday, June 12, 2011

queen elizabeth ii crowning

images queen elizabeth ii crown queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowning.



  • raj7480
    05-24 02:58 PM
    I think Quinn Gillespie will also opine on that and IV can take it from there.

    I have some exp doing this for my company. If you need any help...let me know.





    wallpaper queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowning.



  • suratvoice
    12-17 10:56 PM
    Identify what is the job code in your LC and try to compare the new job duties in the similar category. If you happen to fall within the same group then you are fine. like within 15.****


    http://online.onetcenter.org/link/summary/15-1051.00

    Try to identify the job code of ur new job, then you will be able to compare.

    Hire an attorney before taking any major descisions.

    I looked it up and my current job is http://online.onetcenter.org/link/summary/15-1031.00

    And I did a search for software program manager and software project manager. These bring up the same job codes.

    What does that say????

    Does this mean that its ok to change jobs?





    queen elizabeth ii crowning. Queen Elizabeth II
  • Queen Elizabeth II



  • kaisersose
    02-13 04:00 PM
    You guys deserve it after waiting for so long.

    If they have not used Labor substitution :-).

    Seriously, you can try making an infopass appointment and try your luck. Sometimes if they are in a pleasant mood, you may juts get the answers you need.

    Try it anyway, as you do not lose anything.





    2011 queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning. South Africa Queen Elizabeth
  • South Africa Queen Elizabeth



  • GCMan007
    03-13 01:02 PM
    Congratulations !!

    Looks like TSC abandoned online status updates and emails. My case has been assigned to an officer (again) and enroute to I-485 manager as of Feb 3rd 2008 ( senator feedback ). So far no LUD's or emails.. Looks like instead of checking for emails every other minute , I have to wait for regular mail now.. unfortunately I can do that only once per day !! :( ..

    That exactly happened in my case. I was looking at my online status almost everyday. Not even a soft LUD..the regular mail finally arrived last week with approval status..Online staus still not updated



    more...


    queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowning.



  • prem_goel
    11-25 01:25 PM
    Please make sure you understand and read all the rules before coming to any conclusion. The rule is that only H-1b renewals who had atleast one stamping in their home country are allowed for renewal stamping in Tijuana. I had two previous stamping done at India for my H-1B and this is my renewal, so I am okay.





    queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth 2 coronation.
  • queen elizabeth 2 coronation.



  • gc28262
    12-19 12:03 PM
    Not before you give yours back. you are a temp anyways. you don't even have to surrender your gc.

    Practice what you preach.
    BTW myself and majority of members on this forum hasn't replaced any American worker.



    more...


    queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowning.



  • ita
    01-16 11:13 AM
    Thank you so much vin13.

    So in the case of company C's H1 it will be part of yearly quota and so will have to go through lottery system right?
    So there will be a chance of H1 not going through the lottery(no matter even if the applicant was on H1 before)?

    Thank you again.

    Lets say , you move out of H1-b (company A)and start using your EAD (at Company B). Now after a few weeks you find another employer (company C) who is willing to do your H1-B. Then this is subject to the yearly Quota because you lost your H1-B status immediately after you started using your EAD (at Company B).

    You can now move to Company C using your EAD and then apply under the new quota for H1-B in April for a start date of October (new fiscal year). Company C may not be reluctant or hesitant in your case because you can keep working for them from Day 1 and you continue on your EAD even if you do not get H1-B.

    Company C will be hesitant only if you do not have EAD and you need to wait for the approval before you can work.





    2010 Queen Elizabeth II queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crown
  • queen elizabeth ii crown



  • shahsahil
    04-17 02:45 PM
    So, 10 month is indeed long time.
    I will try to follow up with DOL.

    Will try to find contact information online, if somone has some webpage link handy, pls pass it on.

    -Sahil.



    more...


    queen elizabeth ii crowning. Queen+elizabeth+ii+crown+
  • Queen+elizabeth+ii+crown+



  • everonh1
    06-21 02:59 PM
    I am in same boat.
    Here is my experience with USCIS at San Francisco:-

    Went to USCIS SFO Today.
    They bluntly told me that they have no process to re-issue I-94s.
    Either file an H1 Extension or leave the country and get back in for a new extended I-94.
    I argued with them that this is real crazy - how come you dont have a process to fix the I-94 after passport is extended and well before I-94 expiry date.
    They had no answer and stuck to their answer that they cant do much and I have only those 2 options.
    I asked them if San Francisco CBP will fix it - they said NO,they wont.
    Also,apparently as per USCIS officials,I cant go to any of the border Countries like Canada,Mexico as they dont issue I-94 if stay there is less than 30 days.
    So I have to go out to any country other than border countries and only then I-94 will be issued?
    How more crazy can USCIS be?

    How come AILA or someone never raised this issue with USCIS- as this is such a common scenario.





    hair South Africa Queen Elizabeth queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowned.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowned.



  • amitjoey
    07-09 04:23 PM
    Gave it 5 star, and posted a comment.



    more...


    queen elizabeth ii crowning. came the queen queen Queen
  • came the queen queen Queen



  • RiaonH4
    01-18 11:13 AM
    Cool. Thanks for your replies. One more question. Are you guys currently in US and have applied 485. How do i use Canadian citizenship and 485 pending to maximize my opportunities in us and also have Canadian citizenship as a backup?

    Ria
    :D

    King37 sent you a PM





    hot queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crown
  • queen elizabeth ii crown



  • eb3retro
    09-09 05:23 PM
    can you show me a single post in IV that states that they have travelled after applying for AP, and come back with an AP. May be I missed it.

    the rule states that you have to be present in the country when you apply for AP. It does not say anything on where you need to be when it is approved. There are many cases where the applicant left the US to have the document mailed or taken along with someone to the person out of the US. The applicants on return were not asked anything. It was business as usual.



    more...


    house queen elizabeth ii crown. queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowned.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowned.



  • camarasa
    07-08 10:08 PM
    Stueym I posted this response to your video.

    Well you answered your question in your own video - your family are legal immigrants who by your own admission pay taxes (as you should do) � whereas illegal immigrants don�t pay taxes for fear of being caught. The government thinks it�s best to make them legal quicker so they feel safe to pay taxes like everyone else� go figure?





    tattoo queen elizabeth 2 coronation. queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowning.



  • gc_bulgaria
    10-09 04:18 PM
    http://www.immigration-law.com/

    10/08/2007: I-140 Portability After 180 Days of 485 Filing and Service Centers Standard Procedure of Review and Adjudication


    When there is a retrogression of visa numbers and anticipated long delays in 485 adjudication due to the massive July VB fiasco 485 filings, it is anticipated that there will be a substantial number of 485 applicants who may have to change employment along the way, either voluntarily or involuntarily, under AC 21 Section 106(c) provision. Accordingly, whether one reports the change of employment proactively or not, one should learn the internal review and adjudication procedures within the Service Center which are adopted by the adjudicators in adjudicating such I-485 applications.
    The good material to review on this procedure is the USCIS Standard Operating Procedure for the adjudicators. The SOP states that "If the alien is using the portability provisions of AC21 106(c), the adjudicator must determine that both the ported labor certification and the ported I-140 are still valid under the current employer, especially in regards to the continual payment of the prevailing wage, similar occupation classification, and the employer’s ability to pay the prevailing wage."

    (1) Prevailing Wage Payment: The AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer pays the prevailing wage or higher wage for portability. However, the adjudicators review the wage as part of their determination of "continuing validity" of the ported certified labor certification application and I-140 petition. When the applicant stays with the same employer without changing employer, payment of wage less than the prevailing wage should not present any serious issue inasmuch as the employer establishes that the employer was financially able to pay the prevailing wage and is continuously able to pay the prevailing wage until the green card is approved. However, when there is a change of employer who pays less than the prevailing wage, there is no clear-cut rule with reference to this issue. Payment of less than prevailing wage thus potentially can raise two issues when there is a change of employer. One is the adjudicator's argument that there is no continuing validity of the labor certification or I-140 petition. The other is the argument that different wage reflects that the labor certification job and the new job with the new employer are two different occupational classifications.

    (2) Similar occupational classification issue: The similarity of the two positions involves not the "jobs" but "occupational classification." Accordingly, the old and new positions do not necessarily have to match exactly in every details, especially specific skill sets. Currently, the USCIS is looking up the Labor Department SOC/OES classifications of occupations. When the two jobs fall under the same occupational classification in the DOL occupational definitions, the two jobs are generally considered "similar" occupational classification. As long as the two jobs belong to a similar occupational classification, the applicant can work for the new employer anywhere in the United States. There is no physical location restrictions.

    (3) Employer's financial ability to pay the wage: Again, AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer must prove that the new employer has and will have a financial ability to pay the prevailing wage. However, the adjudicators appear to review the portability case considering the new employer's ability to pay as well as part of review of continuing vality of labor certification and I-140 petition.
    Remember that when there is a portability issue, two things can ensue. If one proactively reports the eligibility of portability meeting all the foregoing requirment, the adjudicators are likely to decide the pending I-485 application on the merit. However, if the 485 applicants do not report proactively change of employment and the USCIS somehow obtains information of the alien's change of employment, for instance, by employer's report of termination of employment or withdrawal of I-140 petition or substitution of alien beneficiary, then 485 applicants are likely to be served a notice of intent to deny I-485 applications or in most cases, the adjudicator transfers the I-485 file to the local district office for interview.

    In AC 21 106(c) portability situation, the adjudicators also review the issue of the continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition involving the original employer, and are likely to raise similar issues which are described above. However, when the alien ports with the "approved" I-140 petition with a copy of the last paycheck and W-2, the adjudicators rarely revisit the original employer's foregoing issues in determining the 140 portability issue. The issues are raised when the alien ports before the I-140 petition is approved. Under the Yates Memorandum, when the alien ports before I-140 petition is approved, the alien has a burden of proof that the I-140 petition was approvable. Accordingly, inasmuch as I-140 petition was approvable and the alien ports after 180 days of I-485 filing, even if the original employer withdraws the I-140 petition, the pending I-485 will not be affected. Yates Memorandum indicates that in such a circumstance, the adjudicator should adjudicate the pending I-140 petition and if finds approvable, then recognizes 106(c) portability and continues to adjudicate the pending I-485 application. Without doubt, in the foregoing situation, the adjudicator will intensively and carefully review the issue of continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition issues which are specified above, particularly the employer's financial ability to pay the wage, and the applicant will have to overcome tremendous hurdles to deal with the challenges by the USCIS. Accordingly, people should not port before I-140 petition is approved unless they are assured that the original employer will continuously cooperate and support his/her green card process.



    more...


    pictures queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowning.



  • delhiguy79
    10-23 01:07 PM
    Thanks for ur reply... but i ve already bought the ticket...so shud i buy another one-way ticket :confused:





    dresses queen elizabeth ii crown queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii coronation
  • queen elizabeth ii coronation



  • rrajasekar
    08-11 09:38 AM
    We have written a letter to our congressman asking if he could help expediting the process. They called us yesterday and said that they would try to do their best though they couldn't promise on the outcome.



    more...


    makeup Queen+elizabeth+ii+crown+ queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crown.
  • queen elizabeth ii crown.



  • gchandu
    04-12 10:12 AM
    Hi

    I e-filed my EAD and AP at Texas Service centre...did not get any FP notices and both EAD and AP got approved...

    Don't know the logic / rule on when will they issue FP notices and for which category / state of people....

    Thanks
    Chandu

    Hi I am planning for self filing EAD. I want to do e-file, but I heard that that if you are e-filing you need to go for finger printing. At the same time I also heard that no matter whether you go for e-filing or sending application to USCIS, if your finger printing is expired than you may need to go for the finger printing. Please suggest the best way to file for the EAD(I-765 form).
    Als one more thing "Which USCIS Office?" section which date I need to put there.





    girlfriend queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth ii coronation
  • queen elizabeth ii coronation



  • HopeSprings
    07-17 03:45 PM
    Murthy is a she...and I would but I'm not single. ;)
    I don't want to start a battle of words here but it would be great if we could refrain from using such language in this forum.

    Administrator, please make sure that we maintain the sanctity of the forum.





    hairstyles came the queen queen Queen queen elizabeth ii crowning. crown. QUEEN ELIZABETH II
  • crown. QUEEN ELIZABETH II



  • bigboy007
    09-29 09:12 AM
    We have taken indian jewellary with us when we travelled to India. I dont think it is a problem and you dont have to declare it in customs. I think if you are carrying cold in the form on coins or bars, you will have to pay customs. I dont remember but it says in the customs form that personal jewellary need not be mentioned. I would check the india's customs website.
    Customs duty for any jewelry if not wearing as in custom rules. but i have noticed duty for coins and jewelry being actively pursued.





    frostrated
    06-21 01:55 PM
    By law: If you take Unemployment benefits => you have become public charge. If you become public charge => you broke AOS condition. Which requires you to be never be public charge. On top of that if you were still on H1b then that would have expired with you loosing your job. So that makes it a good case for removal proceedings if your case gets an audit (which is very likely).
    Lookup a similar thread(removal proceedings) in IV.
    Get legal help before making a decision like that.

    taking unemployment benefit is not public charge. while working, you pay into the unemployment. everytime you work, you and your employer pay for umemployment insurance which is managed by the US government. But to be eligible for umeployment insurance benefit, you have to be a legal permanent resident or a citizen.





    mrsr
    02-20 11:13 AM
    InterFiling Help please gurus...



    No comments:

    Post a Comment