Monday, June 13, 2011

hit floor bullet for my valentine

images ullet for my valentine hit hit floor bullet for my valentine. ullet for my valentine hit
  • ullet for my valentine hit



  • solaris27
    03-12 08:51 PM
    its a good idea





    wallpaper ullet for my valentine hit hit floor bullet for my valentine. ullet for my valentine hit
  • ullet for my valentine hit



  • hiralal
    06-26 10:12 PM
    good initiative ..I am in ..something is better than nothing ..as the old saying says ..lets throw as many stones on the mango tree ..gaya tho pathar ..mila tho aam ..if you miss - you just lose a stone ..if you hit, you get a green mango (green card). ..cheers !!!





    hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet For My Valentine - Hit
  • Bullet For My Valentine - Hit



  • HRPRO
    04-26 11:03 AM
    You definitely need an attorney's representation. Dont waste time mulling over it as more time you waste, bigger the problem.





    2011 ullet for my valentine hit hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet for My Valentine
  • Bullet for My Valentine



  • willgetgc2005
    10-31 04:16 PM
    This This happened to me as well. My AP which was approved in 2005 and has already expired had an LUD today. I have an approved AP in 2006. But my expired 2005 AP had LUD.

    In August my I-140 which was approved in 2005 had an LUD. God knows what all this means. My 485 is pending becuase of retrogression.









    Hi all

    When I checked my email on Saturday I got 10 emails from USCIS.
    5 of them for my 485, 5 of them for EAD I applied in 2004.

    My 485 status before email was something like this: We responded to the additional info you requested on so and so date, if you not received by 14 days contact us. (This status got changed when I did address change in 2005)

    Now it says about my FP which I gave in 2003. I gave FP again some time in 2004 end.
    On May 20, 2003, the results of your fingerprint review for your I485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or to Adjust Status were received, and processing has resumed on your case. We will mail you a notice if further action is needed, or when a decision is made.

    I am not sure why LUD got changed for 2004 EAD now, after that I applied EAD�s 2005 and then 2006.


    I understand if LUD changed means, some one touched our file to update some thing, but I am wondering why 485 Status changed to my First FP message.


    Any one got similar emails......
    __________________
    Thanks



    more...


    hit floor bullet for my valentine. my valentine hit the floor
  • my valentine hit the floor



  • skp71
    03-23 10:41 PM
    But in this PDF doc. it says, "Specter and Frist Immigration Proposals May Increase EB Backlogs".

    http://www.immigrationvoice.org/media/immigrationvoice_memo_hard_country_quota.pdf





    hit floor bullet for my valentine. Hit The Floor Bullet For
  • Hit The Floor Bullet For



  • nefrateedi
    07-16 05:12 PM
    That could explain why NSC never got the memo. Remember only EB I-485 is in question.

    That's incorrect. NSC does accept employment based I-485 applications.



    more...


    hit floor bullet for my valentine. Naruto Amv [Hit the Floor]. 2:38. So This is my old project and i wanted to
  • Naruto Amv [Hit the Floor]. 2:38. So This is my old project and i wanted to



  • optimystic
    09-29 08:43 PM
    USCIS has updated the processing dates pages of all the four service centers on September 28. Now the pages say that these dates are valid as of July 31, 2008 only.

    If I remember well the processing dates information was more up-to-date earlier.

    So looks like CIS has backtracked from their earlier published dates. They are telling us that they simply cannot tell what the current processing dates are. All they can tell us is that what applications they were processing on July 31.

    What can we deduce from this? Is it good? Is it bad? Or no relevance?

    It could be good as CIS might be processing July 2007 485 applications as of today? Or may be not.

    Simply more confusion, as if as it is we were not confused enough.

    Its hard to gauge what they are trying to do here by mentioning that the processing dates are accurate only as of July 31, 2008. But just attempting to make a few guesses. I might be totally wrong though

    - May be they are trying to cover up their silly, non-backable acts of swinging Processing Dates back and forth as a pendulum. And hence keep the web posting data perpetually at a older date, so that if some official corners them they can say "Oh, forget the web data, it is out of date. Here's the more updated *internal* info" . But at the same time to the general public , they can point to "Go look at the web data, I can't open a service request for you based on where the processing dates are at" and thus avoid all accountability and head aches of opening service requests etc.

    - May be they are going to fast forward the dates now that the PDs are retrogressed and people can't file service requests left and right based on processing dates outside normal processing times.





    2010 Bullet For My Valentine - Hit hit floor bullet for my valentine. ullet for my valentine hit
  • ullet for my valentine hit



  • alien2006
    11-17 11:52 AM
    I had a similar problem when I applied for my OPT, not once but twice. The one year EAD had a wrong date, the issue date and expiry date was the same. The second time, they didn't give me the correct start date, so I sent it again. No filing fees since it was their mistake.
    You souldn't have anything to worry about.



    more...


    hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet For My Valentine
  • Bullet For My Valentine



  • brit89
    07-05 08:33 PM
    When the news broke about PDs becoming current, I told 2 of my friends and my family that there is something wrong going on.
    It is a common sense that the visa numbers are governed by policies and should be approved by senators in parliament if not by the president.
    There were no indications in senate sessions nor announcement of any political intervention at the highest level to turn the table all together.
    DOL and USCIS have all excuses to wash their hands of the issue now.
    We should learn to forget what has happened to prepare ourselves to move on and on and on ....
    Unless there happens a miracle like in fairy tales, we never know, all depends on our karma and not worthwhile to blame anybody on this.





    hair Bullet for My Valentine hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet For My Valentine - Hit
  • Bullet For My Valentine - Hit



  • bbenhill
    12-02 08:33 PM
    Your stay status will be Parolee but your work status will be H1 so YES, you will be fine even if you used AP for re-entry.

    PS : I am not a lawyer but I entered using AP and have H1 as my working permit.

    Even if I used AP for re-entry to US?



    more...


    hit floor bullet for my valentine. Hit The Floor: Bullet For My Valentine
  • Hit The Floor: Bullet For My Valentine



  • ItIsNotFunny
    04-04 09:29 AM
    DOS tried to update the system reflecting a big jump in the visa dates for May. The system was unused to any changes lately - leave aside such large forward movements - and as a result it crashed.

    DOS managed to recover the system by replacing all date fields with character fields. The rumor is that the value for all those character fields is now "C", whatever that means.


    Ha ha ha.





    hot my valentine hit the floor hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet For My Valentine - The
  • Bullet For My Valentine - The



  • dvvb
    03-01 02:59 PM
    Hi Sathishav, Thanks for the response.

    Nope, Co. A filed for my I-140 while I was working for Co. B. and is subsequently approved. Filed for I-485 with Co.A in June/2008 while working with Co. B. Used EAD to move to Co. C.

    to summarize,

    Co. A's GC filed as future employee.
    Joined Co. C on EAD.
    Now Co. A is out of buisiness.
    Does AC21 portability applies ?

    Thanks
    -DvvB

    If i understood your post correctly, you have ported of an unapproved I140. I do understand this is for a "future job", but still you have used AC21.

    I agree with your attorney to file, because, if you had worked for Company A and moved AFTER I140 approved and I485 pending for 180 days, you don't have to worry about their status. Since you have not yet worked for them, it safe severe your ties by filing AC21.


    http://www.myvisajobs.com/Document/YatesMay05.pdf

    Question 1. How should service centers or district offices process unapproved I-140 petitions that were concurrently filed with I-485 applications that have been pending 180 days in relation to the I-140 portability provisions under �106(c) of AC21?

    Answer: If it is discovered that a beneficiary has ported off of an unapproved I-140 and I-
    485 that has been pending for 180 days or more, the following procedures should
    be applied:
    A. Review the pending I-140 petition to determine if the preponderance of the evidence establishes that the case is approvable or would have been approvable had it been adjudicated within 180 days. If the petition is approvable but for an ability to pay issue or any other issue relating to a time after the filing of the petition, approve the petition on
    it�s merits. Then adjudicate the adjustment of status application to determine if the new position is the same or similar occupational classification for I-140 portability purposes.
    B. If additional evidence is necessary to resolve a material post-filing
    issue such as ability to pay, an RFE can be sent to try to resolve the
    issue. When a response is received, and if the petition is approvable,
    follow the procedures in part A above.



    more...


    house Bullet For My Valentine - All hit floor bullet for my valentine. ullet, my, valentine,
  • ullet, my, valentine,



  • iheartindia79
    10-27 01:03 PM
    Hi !
    I recently got my EAD. ..but I have not yet got a job..... when should I apply for SSN ? :confused:

    Thank you in advance....

    Vinki.

    You can apply for EAD now. You dont need a job to get SSN because you have EAD.





    tattoo Hit The Floor Bullet For hit floor bullet for my valentine. Naruto AMV Hit The Floor Collab Lautaknaruto, Pablonarutolinkin
  • Naruto AMV Hit The Floor Collab Lautaknaruto, Pablonarutolinkin



  • loudoggs
    12-03 12:22 PM
    Thank you!!

    No. Both times it was a large company (one has an agreement with a big law firm to handle immigration-related issues). I asked my current employer's attorney about it and she told me not to worry, they never had issues with AC21 portability (employer has 120,000+ employees). She was right regarding my case.



    more...


    pictures Naruto Amv [Hit the Floor]. 2:38. So This is my old project and i wanted to hit floor bullet for my valentine. Hit The Floor
  • Hit The Floor



  • dtekkedil
    07-02 11:47 PM
    If we plan to send flowers, we should send them to the SAME place, same person, if a 100 different news stations receive these flowers, this would be of no consequence, the ideal person to send these to would be Bill O reiley, God (yea I invoke his name ;) knows that he loves to talk aout himself, and if you get him involved, and throw in the words like , "BUSH wanted us to be able to AOS", he is going to be all over it.

    I am going to see if I can send him a note :)

    LOL Yeah Bill O' Riley!!!

    I was hoping that we could send it to USCIS!

    It should be addressed to EMILIO T. GONZALEZ (Director of USCIS). I'll put the address out here once I get it! :)





    dresses Bullet For My Valentine - The hit floor bullet for my valentine. top 10 valentine gifts
  • top 10 valentine gifts



  • Saralayar
    05-21 07:59 PM
    Inspite of telling my lawyer she did the mistake of sending my EAD and AP before 120 day period. EAD filed 121 days prior and AP filed 148 days prior. I have gotten the receipts of both but AP status says that they have requested more information/evidence. I am wondering what additional information they need. Anyone else in this situation ?
    Is it 120 business days or just week days?



    more...


    makeup Bullet For My Valentine hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet For My Valentine - All
  • Bullet For My Valentine - All



  • GCnightmare
    08-28 08:58 AM
    thanks munnabhai. I have read somewhere that if I/140 is approved and visa is unavailable then H1 can be extended for 3 yrs. Correct me if its not true.





    girlfriend Naruto AMV Hit The Floor Collab Lautaknaruto, Pablonarutolinkin hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet For My Valentine -
  • Bullet For My Valentine -



  • pthoko
    07-05 03:07 PM
    Hi All,
    Please clarify my doubts if you can.

    The G-325A form is asking for dates of previous employment. I have an issue here.....

    I did an L1 to H1 transfer in 2005. My L1 was valid till APRIL 2006. So my intention was to work with L1 employer till April 2006 and then switch to H1 employer.

    H1 employer also applied for a change of status, I was not aware of the whole status issue that time. I asked the H1 company's lawyer whether I could continue with my L1 employer after getting the H1 and she said it's fine.

    So I got the H1B approval in Oct 2005, but still continued with L1 employer till APRIL 2006, then switched to H1.

    Recently I came to know that this could be an issue. When I was filling the G-325A form, I wondered if I specify that I worked with the L1 employer till APRIL 2006, would they catch this?? Even if they catch , how big an issue would this be??

    If I put the dates to reflect the dates to show that I quit my L1 employer in Oct 2005 itself, would this be an issue?? I guess in this case, if by any chance they ask for any further evidence like pay stubs or W2 in that period of time, I would be in trouble.

    Any advice is appreciated. I'm afraid to talk about this to my current company attorney....

    Thanks.





    hairstyles Hit The Floor: Bullet For My Valentine hit floor bullet for my valentine. Bullet For My Valentine
  • Bullet For My Valentine



  • bkarnik
    04-04 10:36 PM
    The AOS (485) is based on the I-140 approved for the beneficiary listed in the I-140 and not the labor. Besides, the DOL is not really concerned about EB2 or EB3 category. The DOL asks for the alien information just to verify that the job ad is not tailored to meet the alien's qualifications. EB2, EB3, etc are categories under the INA which become applicable only once the I0140 is filed. In a nutshell, your friend should have consulted another attorney before the I-140 was filed under EB3. It is not possible to change the 485 filing to EB2 based on the labor because the immediately preceding step to filing 485 is the I-140 which governs.





    gc_perm2k6
    08-11 01:42 PM
    Got 2 Year EAD.





    prioritydate
    08-06 05:35 PM
    I have an LUD on my I-140 on 04/20/2008(Sunday)



    No comments:

    Post a Comment