Friday, June 3, 2011

people kissing on lips

people kissing on lips. people kissing on lips in bed.
  • people kissing on lips in bed.



  • dgree03
    Apr 12, 12:58 PM
    don't care

    page and keynote still rock

    fixed that for you

    Pages and Number are TRASH compared to Word and Excel(especially excel)

    Keynote is actually pretty good!





    people kissing on lips. kissing lips gif.
  • kissing lips gif.



  • deadkennedy
    Apr 14, 05:10 PM
    Balmer soon to follow as chief of iPhone and iPad development.





    people kissing on lips. People Kissing On Lips Hard
  • People Kissing On Lips Hard



  • avus
    Nov 11, 10:41 PM
    Yes, there is.

    You got a problem wit' that? :rolleyes:


    Why does everyone get so sensitive whenever someone points out a difference in race, culture, etc? It's not like someone said "That <insert racial slur here> can't even say iLife right! What a retard!" Everyone wants to be different and unique, but no one can handle their differences pointed out in a humorous way.

    Yes, it is funny when a Japanese person tries to make the "L" sound and it comes out sounding like an "R", just as it would be equally funny for me to completely bork the Japanese language while attempting to speak it.

    Like freeny said, lighten up. We're laughing with you, unless you can't laugh at yourself, then you're just getting laughed at.

    Gee, you weren't laughing while you wrote this, were you? So pushy and heavy-handed while preaching us to "Lighten up," it is so... American :p





    people kissing on lips. people kissing on lips. people+kissing+on+the+lips; people+kissing+on+the+lips. Squonk. Sep 26, 08:52 AM. Include all the functionality of the Apple remote
  • people kissing on lips. people+kissing+on+the+lips; people+kissing+on+the+lips. Squonk. Sep 26, 08:52 AM. Include all the functionality of the Apple remote



  • gatearray
    Apr 5, 01:01 PM
    1. its obvious you have never used android
    2. the xoom is an excellent device. those stating they think that having a dedicated tablet OS is silly is kidding themselves. How can you consider yourself a "power user" and be tripped up by honeycomb? Seriously, can you only operate touch screens' with grids? I would would submit facebook has a tougher learning curve than honeycomb, but stop with the comments already, 2.2/2.3/3.0 are very well done OS's
    ...

    Yes yes yes, they're all just awesome OS's and the buying public really seems to be dedicated to all the sweet flavors of these many sugary-named, fragmented platforms. Anyway...


    knock-knock

    WHO'S THERE?

    "a true tablet OS blah, blah, blah."

    A TRUE TABLET OS, HOW CAN YOU TELL?

    "there are not enough applications made for me to even arrange in a grid!"


    :)



    more...


    people kissing on lips. The Science of Kissing by
  • The Science of Kissing by



  • manic
    Sep 25, 10:51 AM
    this is the sorryiest bit of non-news ive seen in a while.





    people kissing on lips. people kissing on lips in bed.
  • people kissing on lips in bed.



  • Doc750
    Apr 4, 11:42 AM
    A car that gets 60 mpg will do just as much 'damage' to a road surface as a car that get 8 mpg....but the 50mpg car will pay much, MUCH less for upkeep of that road than the other in a gas-tax based situation.

    so a prius does the same amount of damage to a road as full size RV?



    more...


    people kissing on lips. people kissing on lips in bed.
  • people kissing on lips in bed.



  • shawnce
    Sep 1, 11:17 AM
    I don't remember... Is Core Animation based on OpenGL? The would be information under NDA still.





    people kissing on lips. Kissing on the lips is a
  • Kissing on the lips is a



  • albusseverus
    Mar 23, 06:44 PM
    awesome weaponized imacs.

    Thinner, lighter iPhones wouldn't go astray. Unibody kevlar iPhones and Macs? That would be neat.



    more...


    people kissing on lips. people, People
  • people, People



  • addicted44
    Apr 12, 07:42 PM
    Right now in NYC you can walk in the Apple store anytime and get the Verizon iPad. ATT models are extremely hard to find.

    So how is it that Verizon is preferred???... (I know why but I'll let you guess...:))

    This is not surprising. All the Chinese resellers who were buying iPads in NYC are unlikely to buy the Verizon CDMA, because it cannot be used abroad. The GSM version (i.e. the ATT version) is one that can be used in most places abroad, as long as the iPad is unlocked.





    people kissing on lips. lips in kissing pose
  • lips in kissing pose



  • yankintx
    Nov 18, 07:02 AM
    So a 17 year old can do it but a gigantic company with $50 billion lying there can't. Seems logical to me. :rolleyes:

    Wake up Steve. Seriously.

    Don't fault apple for insisting that the white iPhone parts match perfectly.
    You can bet that if the suppliers could make parts to apples standards, then apple would sell white iPhone.
    If someone does a conversion and then has minor issues such as light leak and parts not matching 100%, they will most likely put up wih it.

    If apple sold white iphones with the same issues, it would be a disaster and a public relations nightmare. So many people who read these forums complain about things so minor, and yet they will put second rate parts on their iPhones and be happy with them.
    I don't blame apple one bit for scrubbing the white iPhone.

    Go figure!



    more...


    people kissing on lips. People Kissing On Lips In Bed.
  • People Kissing On Lips In Bed.



  • TITNTUFF
    Aug 12, 01:56 PM
    I hope it uses it's own battery!:D





    people kissing on lips. the kiss of new lips to feel a
  • the kiss of new lips to feel a



  • gauchogolfer
    Sep 26, 02:54 AM
    I guess Apple has a problem with the free advertising, for some reason. Being associated with new technology like podcasting seems like something Apple would like to foster.

    Would they prefer them to be called 'Zune-casts' ???

    I'm with ya, Onizuka!

    You know what? There was an ex-MTV VJ that made his own show using a Powerbook and two mics and he called it "Podcasting." There was an issue of Wired Magazine with him on the cover damn near two years ago. People were using the term "podcast" before Apple did. Apple has no right to do thsi to teh people who've made their player the most successful MP3/Portable Media device EVER.

    *kicks steve jobs in the nuts for allowing this*



    more...


    people kissing on lips. do not kiss people on the
  • do not kiss people on the



  • Mac Fly (film)
    Oct 26, 11:51 PM
    If you want just the email account then yes, .Mac is not worth it. That's the point. .Mac is more than email, and if you want an email address, get Gmail and hook it up into Mail.app....
    Are you saying you're happy it costs $99? You don't want to pay less, no? :rolleyes: The more complaining and bad feedback we give Apple that this service is simply too expensive the better, and the better chance we have they will begin to pay attention to loads (http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=.Mac%20too%20expensive&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8) of posts/blogs/and stories on this. I feel sick when I have to tell someone how much it costs. I mean they say .Mac syncing is included! You have to pay to sync computers that you payed money for, and worse still you have to give it to the company you bought the computers from?? Give me a break! GMail is free too. iWeb provides little bandwidth, and the whole this is wrapped-up with a tiny storage package. And I don't think the solution is for Apple to give us more storage. I would prefer a cheaper price to more storage any-day. If you want moe storage then you pay $99, otherwise this should cost no more than $49 per year. At the VERY MOST!!





    people kissing on lips. People+kissing+on+lips
  • People+kissing+on+lips



  • ianham
    Jun 10, 08:03 PM
    Stop complaining. You get the iPhone 4 a month before your neighbours do.



    more...


    people kissing on lips. Some people find the act of a
  • Some people find the act of a



  • kainjow
    Apr 18, 10:46 PM
    Price check threads must be in the Marketplace forum.





    people kissing on lips. People Kissing On Lips Hard
  • People Kissing On Lips Hard



  • Dreadnought
    Jun 20, 03:46 PM
    Redeye, you have to enjoy the warm weather a bit. Stop developing that widget and get out into the sun! What am I saying.... Get back to work and work on it all day tomorrow, it's gonna rain anyhow! :D



    more...


    people kissing on lips. Lips to whisper lies,
  • Lips to whisper lies,



  • thatisme
    Mar 29, 12:37 PM
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/canon-ef-s-55-250mm-f-4-5.6-is-lens-review.aspx

    go down to COMPARED ..

    now roll over the images.. if you tell me that that 55-250 shot is a 1.6 crop and the 70-X shots are very different you DO live on another plant (the 55-250 shot was manualy zoomed to match the 70-X shot hence the SLIGHT difference in focal length).. I am assuming same camera..as the review is about the lens and the FoV is too close to be recreated beteen full frame and crop.

    you are twisting things nicely around now..

    @Cliff, my bad I remember seen the high speed crop also on the D3 series but I might be wrong. The D700 however does have a crop but also allows you to shoot your DX lens on full frame (which will vignette) but has no speed increase over the full frame mode.

    Thatisme:
    It is kind of funny how you try to wiggle yourself out of this though...
    We (a buddy and me here, pro photographer but you would dismiss this anyway as him not knowing either, are having a great time with your "knowledge" and your way of going from the 200mm debacle to IMAGE... and no, the image will still not be different between an EF-s and an EF lens at the same focal length on the same body.

    End of story..if you are so sure.. why don't YOU prove ME wrong? you posted 1 picture of a modified 5d, which wasnt even yours. there is no 10mm on full frame (hence the vigneting) so you would have to shoot that 52 with the 10-22 at 22mm and then use a full frame 22 milimeter lens and compare it, because you ARE arguing, at least now, that the image will be different. It won't except for the vignetting.. re-read your own statements from before and watch how you ended up now on the "image" :)

    Don't worry, by Monday I will prove it to you but why don't you prove me wrong before?.. I dare you.

    EF-s lens and EF (or DX and FX for me) at the same focal length on the same camera, same f stop, same shutter speed... Exif data intact.


    To the OP: I have to apologize for this and this is the last post related to Thats me from my side:

    To answer your question: EF-s is cheaper as stated before the mess and is targeted specifically for the crop sensor bodies. You CAN fit both EF-s and EF on a crop sensor body and you will get the same image. EF lenses are just made for full frame as also stated before.

    sorry for the mess.

    With your link provided, I agree there is a slight difference there, but as you said, you ASSUME that it was with the same camera.... That would be my assumption as well, however, that example hardly makes your case, as the 70mm had to be manually dialed in... a small change has a big effect at long distances.... just saying... Show it using a prime (can't) or at the long end of the lens where there is no room for error or adjustment (200mm example). Eliminate all variables.

    So, quit your arguing and prove it with a real world example with your gear. I don't own any EF-S lenses anymore, so let's get that in the great wide open, so I can't run this comparison for you. There is a fundamental reason for that, which gets more to the point of the OP... Image quality is flat out crap as compared with Canon's L glass, which just so happens to be only in the EF mount. Right, wrong or somewhere in-between, this discussion has no bearing for me, since I will never own another EF-S lens anyway. To that point, I won't ever own a 1.6 crop camera again either, for what it's worth.

    I have no further interest in this discussion, so have fun. Enjoy.





    people kissing on lips. kissing Hollywood actress
  • kissing Hollywood actress



  • iJohnHenry
    Apr 6, 05:38 PM
    It would encourage efficiency massively

    And a paucity of lawyers holding public office. http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g158/MouseMeat/Smilies/terical.gif





    people kissing on lips. Kiss on the lips,
  • Kiss on the lips,



  • robbieduncan
    Mar 28, 01:24 PM
    EF-s lenses produce smaller image circles. So they are lighter (and cheaper) than a comparable EF lens would be. That's it.

    Note the focal length is always the focal length. A 50mm lens still has a 50mm focal length on a 1.6 crop camera. It has a different effective field of view, but that's not the same thing.

    Also note this has been going on forever: a 50mm lens on a medium format camera (obviously with a bigger image circle) as a different field of view that it does on a "full frame" camera.

    EF-S 10-22mm is the same focal lens as a EF 16-24L lens, why produce a lens EF-S, when on a crop camera you could just add a EF 16-24mm L lens (other than cost).

    None of this is true. The focal length does not change. The effective field of view (once again not the same thing) of the 10-22 is the same as a 16-35.2mm lens would be on a full frame camera. If you use the 16-24mm lens on a crop camera it will not have the same effective field of view as the 10-22.





    Laird Knox
    May 2, 02:57 PM
    It's clearly a QA issue Apple is having with the phones...which I think is sad given the time it took for them to release. :(

    That's some serious QC issues.

    Probably just terrible manufacturing, different moulds, etc.

    Seriously? 1/128" is a serious QA/manufacturing issue?





    benji888
    Mar 13, 05:32 PM
    Apple is not to blame here, if you read the comments below you'll see the cell providers are:

    "The source of the time displayed on your phone is actually input by a person.

    Norrmally, most carriers try to ensure the most accurate time by having the person that sets the clock call one of the atomic clock phone numbers, but in the end, it is still typed in by hand.

    This statement is not going to be true forever. Many companies are making changes to the systems that control the cellular network, and, since getting the time-of-day is relatively easy to accomplish now, it won't be long until this function is taken out of the hands of a person.

    Edited answer: The person who said I was wong was basically right. CDMA and GSM networks use a GPS clock, but the switch still needs to know what offset to use for the local time. All GPS sats use UTC, not local time. TDMA and AMPS networks still have their time entered by hand."

    People w/android phones last year: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/android/thread?tid=2b40c14578465fd1&hl=en

    http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/701202

    "Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:47 pm*
    Post subject: Re: Last execution Time giving wrong time : Post DST issue
    Greetings,*

    I think you'll have to change the time manually. I've had to do it on several servers and on my windows 5.0 cell phone. As a matter of fact, my cell phone said it changed the clock time, but it didn't and then I found it changed all my calendar events to 1 hr forward. Go figure.*

    Good luck. Have a great day."

    ...maybe I could have found more with different search words, but I think this tells the real story, cell phones get their time from their cell service which is more localized and not maintained/monitored the same way as your ISP for your computer. (I've had clock setting issues when traveling w/laptop, but normally you are in one or two places at most w/laptop and not reliant upon a network of cell towers with more variables).

    Calendar events are reliant upon the time being set right in the phone, again, not apple's fault, the cell carrier's problem. This has been an issue since people starting using smart phones (of any brand) for their alarm.





    WestonHarvey1
    Feb 24, 12:44 AM
    It's like the extreme right wing has invaded this board. I'd expect at least one defense of government regulations here.





    Pistol Pete
    Oct 26, 02:55 PM
    whatever we just need rosetta for our PPC Macs ;)





    SAD*FACED*CLOWN
    Aug 19, 06:53 PM
    Why does it work only in the US?

    Facebook is a US based company, it will roll out globally soon



    No comments:

    Post a Comment