Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Nicki Minaj Ebony

images NEW Nicki Minaj Ebony magazine Nicki Minaj Ebony. Ebony short and medium bob
  • Ebony short and medium bob


  • Berkeleybee
    09-01 07:58 PM
    Hi All,

    Thanks for the warm words.

    I am very much around, just buried under a juggernaut project at work so I can't be IV 24-7. I hope to get a life in a month or so.

    I have too much invested in IV and this whole issue to just walk away. That Senate bill has stuff the IV content team cracked and crafted, which the rest of the crew strategized to actually get into the bill that passed. We have to carry it to the finish line -- which may look like a mirage right now -- but we will get there.

    Keep faith.

    best,
    Berkeleybee




    wallpaper Ebony short and medium bob Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj#39;s Ebony Magazine
  • Nicki Minaj#39;s Ebony Magazine


  • chanduv23
    02-15 09:26 AM
    Hi,
    My friend got GC when he was single. Later he got married . So spouse is still in India . She has not received GC. She has no visa to visit him.
    That is the reason H1B option is being explored. She has the right qualifications and relevant experience. US Corporation is willing to sponser her H1B petition.

    Since her husband is already in USA and green card holder, visa officer might reject her H1B petition stating that she is an intended immigrant.

    or
    he might issue the H1B visa because it is a dual intent visa.

    So what's the chances of her getting the H1B visa.

    Thanks

    Check out some websites, there is something called hardship waiver, see if it applies to your case




    Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj in Ebony Magazine,
  • Nicki Minaj in Ebony Magazine,


  • nb_des
    09-21 11:33 AM
    One more question:

    When we create a application can we add any member with in the same group. My friend and myself are planning to visit India during the same time. We both are in 8th year extension and work for different companies. Both of us have to get VISA stamped. Can we create in the same application(ofcourse we need to create new application for each one after you create for one person) so that when we want to change dates like prepone or postpone it will be easy for us to modify the appointment date in one click. As dates keep changing every day/hour it will be easy for any one of us to monitor the available dates and change. We can change the dates only once and if we want do it again we need to cancel the appt and create a new one.
    I dont think you can do that.




    2011 Nicki Minaj#39;s Ebony Magazine Nicki Minaj Ebony. Dr. Ebony Utley
  • Dr. Ebony Utley


  • manusingh
    12-23 05:28 PM
    nlssubbu, its amazing that you still check IV and answer other's questions. I got my first AP and i travelled once and after coming back renewned my H1B and now i am thinking of applying for AP renewal. Can you please tell me if I can travel while the AP renewal application pending? The instructions in I-131 form says, the application will be abondoned if the person leaves the country after filing I-131.

    can you share your exp. about using AP than get H-1b extension and again using of AP. how did it go.

    regards



    more...

    Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj is featured in the
  • Nicki Minaj is featured in the


  • gcisadawg
    03-30 08:20 PM
    If you apply for extnsion, please keep in mind your parents stays in US until you receive their approval extension. If they travel outside the while case pending and if they try to renter before case is approved, they will deny at POE and cancel and 10 Year multiple visa. Be very careful here.

    I applied for an extension for my mother-in-law. It was approved several months after her I-94 expiration date. But she left to India two days before her I-94 expiration date. I even sent a letter asking them to cancel/withdraw my application. They didnt care and went ahead and approved. When it came, it was pretty much useless!

    What I heard was, when you apply for an extension, the stay after I-94 expiration date is approved by US Attorney general for certain number of days. We didn't pursue that option since we thought that it could jeopardize her subsequent trip.




    Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj is featured in the
  • Nicki Minaj is featured in the


  • uma001
    05-07 10:30 AM
    May I know on what basis you are recommending this. Do you have any legal basis.?

    What do you mean by legal basis. He agreed to pay $2 to company A (in email) until the project ends. If this is correct, he should continue paying $2 to company A. Since the OP stopped paying $2 , company A wants to make sure that the project ended.

    Ofcourse, Since thee is no contract or agreement between company A and OP, no need to pay $2. But that is not fair on his part. Company A is not asking for 25-40% from billing, He just asked for $2 per hour.



    more...

    Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj, Lil Kim,
  • Nicki Minaj, Lil Kim,


  • Adam
    08-19 11:41 AM
    nice, temp :thumb: I might have a go later as well. I doubt I'll be able to pull it off though :lol:




    2010 Nicki Minaj in Ebony Magazine, Nicki Minaj Ebony. NEW Nicki Minaj Ebony magazine
  • NEW Nicki Minaj Ebony magazine


  • san3297
    03-23 08:34 AM
    Hi,
    I currently have a lowtraffic website with no ads.I am planning to add some adds like googleads,yahoo adwords etc..The thing is i need to give them my ssn while regestering for them and payment check will be made on my personal name.As iam currently on H1 i am in dilemma whether i can take this payments or not.Does anyone aware of dos and donots in this case.Thank you.



    more...

    Nicki Minaj Ebony. nicki minaj look
  • nicki minaj look


  • EBX-Man
    05-11 03:51 PM
    smuggymba / getgreensoon1 / vdlrao

    While I am touched by your concern for EB1 fraud and how it impacts EB3, i would hazard a guess that the OP was a troll OP and does not merit any answers




    hair Dr. Ebony Utley Nicki Minaj Ebony. We debuted Nicki#39;s OUT
  • We debuted Nicki#39;s OUT


  • sathyaraj
    11-14 01:16 PM
    My opinion is not to waste to get the replacement EAD as it is already approved. As per my understanding most of the employers do want only the copy of the EAD card for verification purposes. My wife was never been asked EAD card when she was attending interviews. They needed only copies.

    Also if you still want to apply, see whether you can apply for renewal card so that you would atlz get an extra year from your current card's expiry date.

    It is better to inform USCIS though just to prevent any possible identity theft.

    P.S. I am not a lawyer. This is just my thoughts!



    more...

    Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj is crushing the
  • Nicki Minaj is crushing the


  • indianindian2006
    07-26 11:54 AM
    My company attorneys are in the process of filing my AOS application per the July bulletin. I have an approved labor certification and an approved I-140. Turns out due to internal restructuring a new legal vehicle was created under the existing company and groups re-aligned. Job function and location haven't changed.

    The attorneys are syaing that since the I-140 was approved prior to the restructuring, they will be filing a new successor-in-interest I-140 with my AOS application.

    My question is since I had an approved I-140 is this considered an amendment to the previous i-140 and processed at I-485 adjudication stage or is it considered a brand new filing aubject to the i-140 backlog in processing.

    I would appreciate a response from Logiclife (since he had posted a similar scenario) or sopmeone else in similar situations or with knowledge of the above.
    What is the total number of employes your company.




    hot Nicki Minaj is featured in the Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj is crushing the
  • Nicki Minaj is crushing the


  • SunilKoganti
    01-23 03:08 PM
    Thanks IV core group for your efforts, time and energy you spend to fight for our cause.



    more...

    house WHAT#39;Z THE 411: Nicki Minaj#39;s Nicki Minaj Ebony. Ebony-Michelle-Barack
  • Ebony-Michelle-Barack


  • gc28262
    07-16 07:30 AM
    Murthy Bulletin
    VOL. XVI, no. 29; Jul 2010, week 3
    Posted : 16.Jul.2010

    MurthyDotCom : MurthyBulletin (http://murthy.com/bulletin.html)

    Many MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers have inquired about whatever happened to those H1B workers who encountered problems at the Newark, New Jersey port of entry (POE) in January 2010. The incidents in Newark struck fear in the hearts of many H1B foreign nationals who needed or wanted to travel abroad or return to the United States from abroad. This is the success story of one such traveler, who was denied entry at the Newark POE, and was banned at the POE from returning to the United States for five years under an order of expedited removal. He came to the Murthy Law Firm for help after he had returned to his home country under the order of expedited removal. This client of our firm has generously allowed us to share his success story with MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers. Information about a client or a case is never reported to our readers without consent of the client.

    Background of Denial of Entry to the U.S. in January 2010

    The problems of this individual were similar to those described in our January 14, 2010 NewsFlash entitled, Note to H1Bs Traveling to the U.S. and Working for Consulting Companies. The airport at issue was Newark International Airport in New Jersey. The traveler was returning to the U.S. and, rather than the routine verification of documents and basic information, he was questioned in detail about his employment. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers questioned him regarding the validity of his H1B employment, the identity of his employer's customers, and whether or not his employer had sufficient work for him. As explained below, the CBP was not satisfied with the information it gathered and, ultimately, exercised its authority to issue an expedited removal order against the foreign national, who became a client of the Murthy Law Firm after he was sent back to India.

    Travel Outside of the United States

    The foreign national had traveled outside of the United States and returned to his home country to get married. He carried with him a letter from his H1B employer, verifying that he would resume his H1B employment upon his return to the U.S. After his wedding celebration, his wife applied for an H-4 dependent visa through a U.S. consulate in the couple's home country. They presented the employer's letter to the consular office in support of the H-4 visa application. The consulate was satisfied with the evidence presented, and issued the H-4 visa. The gentleman who later became our client then attempted to return to the United States alone, with plans for his wife to follow soon after.

    CBP Checks on Returning H1B Workers

    When the individual attempted to reenter the United States, his experience at the POE was far from ordinary. The CBP officers placed him into what is known as secondary inspection. This is the procedure for foreign nationals who cannot be quickly and routinely processed through the standard primary inspection. The traveler was questioned about his employer, his work, and the end-client where he was performing his work. He was asked whether or not his employer had enough work to keep him employed throughout the duration of his H1B petition. One CBP officer contacted his employer, using the contact information on the employer's letter. The H1B employer was surprised by the call from CBP and did not firmly state that he had sufficient work to keep this particular H1B worker fully employed for the rest of the duration of the H1B petition.

    The CBP officer took this information and determined that the foreign national was not returning to resume valid nonimmigrant work on his H1B visa. The officer instead considered the foreign national to be an intending immigrant seeking admission to the United States without a proper immigrant visa. This is one of the grounds under the law that permits an expedited removal. The officer cancelled the individual's H1B visa stamp in his passport and entered an expedited removal order against him, which carries the penalty of a five-year bar to reentering the U.S. The gentleman was then ordered to depart the U.S. on the next flight back to his home country.

    Removed H1B Worker Contacts Murthy to Take Action

    The foreign national contacted Murthy Law Firm after this unfortunate incident, and requested our assistance. The case was assigned to our Special Projects department, and we quickly made contact with the CBP officers at the port of entry involved. Our attorneys analyzed the case and found several legal mistakes that were made in the process of cancelling the H1B visa as well as in issuing the expedited removal order. A detailed legal argument was drafted and sent to the lead CBP official for the POE.

    New H1B Petition Approval

    While the Murthy Law Firm team was working on this case, our client obtained a new job offer from his H1B employer's end-client. The job involved duties identical to his previous position, but as a direct employee of the prior end-client company. The new employer obtained an approval of its H1B petition for consular processing. The only thing standing between our client and a great job was the five-year ban on his return to the United States that was created by the expedited removal order. The attorney assigned to this case contacted a U.S. senator representing the state where the new employer is located and began a series of actions that led to a review of the expedited removal.

    Murthy Takes Action to Reverse Earlier CBP Decision

    The review and reconsideration of expedited removal orders is not explicitly provided for in the regulations that control the day-to-day operations of the CBP. The Murthy Law Firm team succeeded in showing that the events that transpired for our client were extremely unusual and required review by leaders at CBP. Due to the new employer's need for this individual's skills, the attorney contacted several officers at CBP, filed a second official request with CBP, and worked with the U.S. senator's office to show that there was a serious and urgent need for a decision.

    Determined Follow-up Leads to Relief

    The persistence of our excellent legal team paid off. After almost ten weeks of communications with the CBP and other government offices, the CBP issued a letter stating that, while there is no appeal of expedited removal orders under the law, CBP was exercising its discretion and overturning its prior expedited removal order. The letter was quickly forwarded to our client, who scheduled his H1B visa interview at the appropriate U.S. consulate in India. He was issued his H1B visa at the conclusion of his consular interview and he then made the arrangements necessary for his wife and himself to return to the United States so that he could commence his new H1B employment.

    Conclusion

    We at the Murthy Law Firm are proud to share another of our many successful stories with our readers. We would like to extend our deep appreciation for the hard work and cooperation of the CBP officers in reconsidering their prior decision and taking the bold step, even though there was no law or regulation for an appeal or reconsideration of an earlier CBP decision. We also send our thanks the U.S. senator's staff, who worked to resolve the incorrect expedited removal order, which would have resulted in the five-year bar to our client's ability to return to the United States. Finally, our gratitude is offered once again to our client for his permission, allowing us to share his story, thereby providing hope to others.




    tattoo Nicki Minaj is featured in the Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj to Ebony
  • Nicki Minaj to Ebony


  • ashkam
    03-25 08:17 AM
    How come they cannot consider my EAD, Official transcripts, Graduate status letter?
    Regarding Status letter, I have seen students applying like this and getting query later. What do you say about the students graduating in May (who files like me with OPT card and status letter) and applying for H1 in April?

    You can postpone your graduation but you need to have completed all your credit hours and thesis work if any before you can apply on the master's degree quota. That is what people use their status letters for, to tell the USCIS that they have completed all degree requirements but will graduate later. In your case, since you haven't finished your degree requirements and will not do so by the time you apply for your H1B, the status letter is of no use.



    more...

    pictures Nicki Minaj, Lil Kim, Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj Is Larger Than
  • Nicki Minaj Is Larger Than


  • retropain
    09-07 03:48 PM
    I guess a lot of folks (including me) have not had the opportunity to file for the 485. And most of the folks who did file 485's have already been approved.




    dresses Nicki Minaj is crushing the Nicki Minaj Ebony. Giant Nicki Minaj
  • Giant Nicki Minaj


  • rajenk
    10-08 10:33 AM
    Our I-485 got approved on 10/01/2010. Yes porting PD and interfiling works. Follow the instructions in my IV blog



    more...

    makeup nicki minaj look Nicki Minaj Ebony. WHAT#39;Z THE 411: Nicki Minaj#39;s
  • WHAT#39;Z THE 411: Nicki Minaj#39;s


  • hebron
    10-05 09:43 AM
    How about Bangaram Islands, if you like snorkelling ..




    girlfriend Nicki Minaj to Ebony Nicki Minaj Ebony. Ebony Magazine recently featured Nicki Minaj in it#39;s December/January issue.
  • Ebony Magazine recently featured Nicki Minaj in it#39;s December/January issue.


  • chi_shark
    06-24 04:28 PM
    i dont think the question is about earning a paycheck. The question is about being employed or not. Perhaps it could also be termed as "being working" or not.

    If the EAD does not come in time. I have a strong feeling that you can take leave without pay or with pay.
    Paid leave is a benefit. You earn the leave ( 1.5 day every month you worked legally). The salary you get during paid leave is not the salary of the day you worked. It is a benefit you received when you worked during your legal stay. Hence I do not feel that one have to be leave without pay. For example if you get your tax refund when your EAD is expired. We should reject the refund?




    hairstyles Nicki Minaj is crushing the Nicki Minaj Ebony. Nicki Minaj x Ebony Jenkins
  • Nicki Minaj x Ebony Jenkins


  • mita
    09-30 06:13 PM
    FIFO must be based on PD and not on I-485 application receive date, I hope you meant the same.
    there was a thread yesterday discussing this news. It is indeed welcome news. Atleast now USCIS should concentrate on FIFO approvals. There are just too many 2003/4/5 EB-2I applicants waiting in line when 2006 applicants got approved in a frenzy last couple of months...what a cruel joke! and for EB-3I, this news may reveal the total number of cases pending. Nobody seemed to know the accurate count...




    smssharma25
    12-05 08:41 PM
    I am also having the same problem. Our company won't share the labor application details with us. I know only job title. I am not even sure what job I should search for.

    I hear that new job description should exactly match with what is there in labor. I am frustrated with my current company & I need to make a shift.

    Can anyone help me to understand the risk in joining my client as direct employee?. I am working for this client for last 10 years. My H1 extension was done using the letter from this customer & my resume also details the experience with this client. Am I safe to join client using my EAD?

    Thanks!
    sharma




    pappu
    02-02 02:54 PM
    House Immigration Subcommittee Holds Hearing on Naturalization

    On January 17, the House Immigration Subcommittee held its first oversight hearing of the year, and the subject was the naturalization processing backlogs. Due to a confluence of factors, including a very significant fee increase that went into effect on July 30, 2007, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received approximately double the number of naturalization applications in its Fiscal Year 2007 than it had during the previous year. USCIS is saying that, as of now, anyone who applied for naturalization after June 1, 2007, can expect to wait 16 to 18 months to have their application processed.

    Remarks by Subcommittee Members

    In her opening comment, Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Chair of the Subcommittee, noted that one year ago, the Subcommittee had a hearing on the proposed fee increase, and was told by USCIS that it need the fee increase to increase efficiency. At the time, the processing time for citizenship applications was six months.

    Representative Steve King (R-IA), the ranking Republican on the Subcommittee, played the role of immigration historian. In his opening statement (and in his questioning), he focused almost exclusively on the INS� Citizenship USA program of ten years ago�back in the day before computers were standard issue in the immigration agency. In that effort to deal with a naturalization backlog, some applicants were granted citizenship before criminal background checks were completed, and some who received citizenship were found later not to be eligible. (Since then, however, much more stringent processes have been put in place to screen applications for naturalization. And the agency now does have computers.)

    USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez

    Emilio Gonzalez, Director of USCIS, gave some background on the development of the backlog and summarized what USCIS was doing about it. During June, July, and August of last year, USCIS received three million immigration benefit applications of all kinds. Their first priority was issuing receipts for those applications. Next, they processed and sent work authorizations, which they are required to do within 90 days.

    In the meantime, a large number of naturalization applications piled up. To deal with the extra workload, USCIS is hiring 1,500 new employees (in addition to the extra staff they planned to hire after the new fees went into effect). The agency is also re-hiring former (retired) employees. While waiting for the additional staff to be trained and deployed, the agency will be asking current staff to work overtime, using budgeted overtime early in the Fiscal Year.

    Other steps are also being taken. Still, Mr. Gonzalez noted (in his written testimony) that it will take until the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2010 before the agency is back to a six-month processing time.

    During the question and answer session, there was a fair amount of discussion about a portion of the backlog that preceded the surge in applications and was caused by a delay in the background checks conducted by the FBI. Some individuals have been in limbo for well over a year waiting for clearance from the FBI, and Mr. Gonzalez noted that last year more than 5,000 lawsuits were filed against the agency�80% on the FBI name check delays. The FBI, he said, has a paper-based system that is only beginning to be addressed. For now, it takes people to handle the files. The FBI has brought on some additional contract personnel and full-time employees to work on this problem.

    Rep. Lofgren said that she would ask the FBI to come before the Subcommittee to explain its perspective on the name check delays. [Subsequently, we were told that the full Judiciary Committee will have a hearing with the FBI on a range of issues, including the name check issue.]

    Non-Government Witnesses

    Also testifying at the hearing were Arturo Vargas, Director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials and Fred Tsao, Policy Director for the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. Mr. Vargas said that his organization kept USCIS apprised of its efforts to get immigrants to become citizens and the agency should have taken that information, plus experience with past fee increases, into account to take steps to be better prepared for the surge in applications. NALEO is recommending that the agency focus sufficiently on reducing the backlog so that all immigrants who applied for naturalization in Fiscal Year 2007 (which ended September 30, 2007) are sworn in as citizens by July 4, 2008. Otherwise, many immigrants who applied for citizenship last summer will not be able to vote in the elections this November.

    Mr. Tsao echoed the point about USCIS having ample information that a surge in applications was coming. He recommended that USCIS (and the FBI) report regularly to the Subcommittee regarding progress being made on reducing the backlog.

    In concluding the hearing, Rep. Lofgren suggested that she might also conduct a hearing on the agency�s information technology.

    Additional Information

    In a subsequent meeting with community-based organizations, Michael Aytes, Associate Director for Domestic Operations of USCIS, gave some additional specifics on the status of the naturalization backlogs. He noted that the total number of new employees being hired will be approximately 3,000�between the additional staff they are hiring to deal with the backlog and the extra staff being paid for by the fee increases. Regarding the FBI name check issue, he noted that, during the House hearing, every member of the Subcommittee�Republican and Democrat�inquired about the name check issue, and that this issue is now being dealt with at high levels both in the Justice Department (in which the FBI is located) and in DHS. He indicated that decisions have been made on the hiring of many of the new adjudicators that are being brought on board, but training and placement are still weeks away, at least.

    He also said that the agency is starting Saturday and evening interviews, and applicants should be encouraged to make every effort to show up for their interviews.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment