Wednesday, June 8, 2011

licencia de manejo

licencia de manejo. Escuela de Manejo Magañalicencia de manejo. Escuela de Manejo Magaña
  • Escuela de Manejo Magaña


  • sriteam
    07-07 02:12 PM
    http://digg.com/politics/Feds_play_games_with_immigrants




    licencia de manejo. Licencia de Manejolicencia de manejo. Licencia de Manejo
  • Licencia de Manejo


  • gccovet
    11-20 08:40 AM
    I filed for my EAD in August, got an approval for EAD (2 yrs) and AP for one yr but no FP notice. What should I do
    I checked with my lawyer and she says previous FP is valid for 15 to 18 months

    Kindly Advise what should i do...

    Did you paper file or efile?
    If paper filed, no FP is required.
    GCCovet




    licencia de manejo. la nueva Licencia Nacionallicencia de manejo. la nueva Licencia Nacional
  • la nueva Licencia Nacional


  • LostInGCProcess
    11-06 02:39 PM
    Does she have EAD? If not on H1, she needs to be in EAD. (or other status like F1 etc). Otherwise she is out of status. In that case, H1 will be denied because an H1 application while out of status will lead to denial.

    There is no mention from the original poster that she was out of status at any time. Also, one need not have an EAD, just to be in status. Your GC (i-485) is for future job, so, technically you can just sit at home...till you get the GC. But you must have a permanent offer letter from the GC sponsored company.




    licencia de manejo. la licencia de Conducir delicencia de manejo. la licencia de Conducir de
  • la licencia de Conducir de


  • roseball
    03-07 10:34 AM
    you can re-enter with previous visa stamp with company A's annotation as long as it is still valid..however, you need to have the latest I-797 approval notice from your current employer and show it to the immigration officer at the poe...



    more...

    licencia de manejo. CURSOS DE MANEJO LICENCIASlicencia de manejo. CURSOS DE MANEJO LICENCIAS
  • CURSOS DE MANEJO LICENCIAS


  • pathmaker
    09-18 11:16 PM
    What if a person has active TB and is currently being treated? Doctors are saying it will take 9 months to complete the medication.

    Q1. Do we need to wait till 9 months to apply for I140 and 485?
    Q2. When will the medical records be opened and monitored? is it when my 485 is being processed or before giving EAD?
    Q3. If doctor says we have TB on the form, will i be queried by govt to get it checked again, or will i be rejected?"

    You should have no issues and your case should not be denied based on Medical grounds read more on the following

    http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVAP.jsp?dockey=724ce55f1a60168e48ce159d28615 0e2

    contact your attorny

    -pratap




    licencia de manejo. licencia de manejolicencia de manejo. licencia de manejo
  • licencia de manejo


  • jsquare
    08-21 09:24 AM
    I am filing for my EAD renewal and had a quick question...I have an EAD card from when I was in college and did my OPT. The problem though is that I do not have some of the details that they ask for while filing EAD renewal, such as what Center was it processed at & what was the application date.

    I have already called USCIS & they cant pull up what center my EAD was filed at or the date it was filed. Can anyone suggest what I should do in this situation? What do I put in the form? Does anyone have similar experiences?

    I suggest, call immigration department of your Graduate school, they must have the details. Or just leave it blank that information. One of my friend had EAD on OPT and when he applied firt time for EAD(while pending I-485), he left that information as blank and he got his EAD

    These are my suggetions



    more...

    licencia de manejo. su licencia de manejo conlicencia de manejo. su licencia de manejo con
  • su licencia de manejo con


  • GCOP
    10-21 05:07 PM
    I also called the number 202-224-7703. The lady told me that, it is scheduled for hearing this fall and we can check on Website judiciary.senate.gov . She said, usually they post the date, 1 week before the hearing in the committee. She is also told that, she is going to pass on the message for hearing, to the senators.




    licencia de manejo. o la licencia de manejo.licencia de manejo. o la licencia de manejo.
  • o la licencia de manejo.


  • inskrish
    09-01 01:46 AM
    Hi

    I see that RFE is requested on my I-485 along with my wife application. I haven't received the notice yet. Could you please let me know if any july 2007 filers have RFEs on their cases.

    Help is much appriciated.

    Thanks

    Hi,

    Most of the I-485 RFEs I have heard/seen so far is related to (1) AC-21 and (2) Birth Certificate, but your case may be different. All the best.



    more...

    licencia de manejo. otorga licencias de manejolicencia de manejo. otorga licencias de manejo
  • otorga licencias de manejo


  • abhi_jais
    12-03 11:35 PM
    I don't think consulate ask details of all employees if size is 5k or more. Further more you can tell officer that it is impossible to get wage details of all employee. I hear some time some desi companies gives w2 of all employees etc.. would consular officer show his/her w2 ? but since our desi companies feeding what they need , they ask what ever...

    In this case they did ask for the details of all the employees of the company, probably they want to make sure that the employer has hired some US citizens as well. The company size is about 500-1000 employees. Since they have asked for the employee detail the employer has to provide that information otherwise the employee would not be able to get the visa stamped.

    Let's see hoping for the best.




    licencia de manejo. la licencia de manejo alicencia de manejo. la licencia de manejo a
  • la licencia de manejo a


  • MCQ
    08-07 05:20 PM
    Billboard - i understand your employer's concern - when I used AC21 back in 2003, with EAD, it was a struggle to get employers that would take me on - for similar concerns. I eventually found one, a startup in CA, that would. Their attitude was that their HR people tagged the expiration date of every doc, type of doc and immigration status of every employee they accepted for I-9 purposes, and had it enetered into a database linked to their mail system - every week it would email out to HR a list of docs that would expire for non-citizens and HR then worked with those folks to make sure docs like EAD's were being renewed etc.
    A little proactive due diligence, common sense and not so modern technology will easily help keep the employer comliant and more receptive to folk on EAD.
    I eventually got my GC from these same guys and this month will file N-400 for citizenship.

    McQ



    more...

    licencia de manejo. de licencias de conducirlicencia de manejo. de licencias de conducir
  • de licencias de conducir


  • raysaikat
    03-06 05:47 PM
    Thanks for the response forgerator. But I would argue that, the problem lies in the fact that there's no obvious link between my work and college major. So if I'm able to somehow re-establish that link, it's still possible to get an H1B. I understand that most H1B visas went to people who work in IT, finance, etc. But I don't see that as an absolute impediment in terms of me getting one.

    The key here is that the degree you have attained must be "required" by the job. So you need find a job that requires a degree in French.

    Here is the exact language of the law from 8 CFR:

    "(iii) Criteria for H-1B petitions involving a specialty occupation.


    (A) Standards for specialty occupation position. To qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the following criteria:


    ( 1 ) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position;


    ( 2 ) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree;


    ( 3 ) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or


    ( 4 ) The nature of the sp ecific duties are so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree.


    (B) Petitioner requirements. The petitioner shall submit the following with an H-1B petition involving a specialty occupation:


    ( 1 ) A certification from the Secretary of Labor that the petitioner has filed a labor condition application with the Secretary,


    ( 2 ) A statement that it will comply with the terms of the labor condition application for the duration of the alien's authorized period of stay,


    ( 3 ) Evidence that the alien qualifies to perform services in the specialty occupation as described in paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(A) of this section, and


    (C) Beneficiary qualifications. To qualify to perform services in a specialty occupation, the alien must meet one of the following criteria:


    ( 1 ) Hold a United States baccalaureate or higher degree required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college or university;


    ( 2 ) Hold a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a United States baccalaureate or higher degree required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college or university;


    ( 3 ) Hold an unrestricted state license, registration or certification which authorizes him or her to fully practice the specialty occupation and be immediately engaged in that specialty in the state of intended employment; or


    ( 4 ) Have education , specialized training, and/or progressively responsible experience that is equivalent to completion of a United States baccalaureate or higher degree in the specialty occupation, and have recognition of expertise in the specialty through progressively responsible positions directly related to the specialty."

    More from USCIS:
    USCIS - H-1B Specialty Occupations and Fashion Models (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=73566811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=73566811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60a RCRD)




    licencia de manejo. la Licencia de Manejo.licencia de manejo. la Licencia de Manejo.
  • la Licencia de Manejo.


  • jkays94
    03-31 02:13 AM
    He says in the talk, the job market in India is booming right now and it offers promotion opportunitieis etc ...

    In some places, depending on your experience and capabilities, you might as well get comparable salary to US. Given that cost of living is low in India, you might end up with same disposable income after taxes and expenses.

    Good to hear that Americans are getting an idea what it would be to live in a shell in a global economy. Germany, UK opened up their borders and more EU countries might follow suit like Netherlands, Belgium, lastly France.

    Not forgetting Canada in the mix, Canadian permanent residency is attainable in between 9 months to 24 months if one applies while residing in the US as a skilled worker and has work experience.

    And this just yesterday :

    ABOARD TP-01, NORTHERN MEXICO — Mexican President Vicente Fox has proposed that Canada open its doors to growing numbers of unskilled Mexican "guest workers" to deal with a looming labour shortage brought on by an aging Canadian population.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060328.wxfoxx28/BNStory/National/home

    ***
    At the end of the day the US stands to be the looser. It appears that congress has forgotten about the impending retirement of over 75 million baby boomers. I am aware of many friends stuck in the BEC's or endless H1B extensions who are applying for Canadian permanent residency which they attain in as little as 9 months (if the interview is waived and depending on the skill). It will be no wonder if Canada soon becomes a destination for many skilled workers from the US who abandon their quest to become GC holders in the face of excruciating backlogs and needless hoops and hurdles.

    ***
    Monday, October 31, 2005 Page A1 GLOBE AND MAIL

    Immigration Minister Joe Volpe, who will table his annual report to Parliament today, says Canada hopes to be taking in as many as 300,000 immigrants a year within five years, and will start by raising its target for next year to between 225,000 and 255,000. Canada is on track to accept 245,000 this year, the very high end of last year's target.

    "We have to start thinking about the Immigration Department as a recruiting vehicle for Canada's demographic and labour market needs . . . we are the lungs of the country," said Mr. Volpe in an interview with The Globe and Mail. "We are producing more jobs than the labour market has workers for. . . . We're desperate for immigration."



    more...

    licencia de manejo. LICENCIA DE CONDUCIR.licencia de manejo. LICENCIA DE CONDUCIR.
  • LICENCIA DE CONDUCIR.


  • eb3India
    09-25 10:19 AM
    Here is the mail from AILA,
    September 25, 2006


    Dear Immigration Advocates-

    Your help is STILL needed TODAY! Senate Appropriators will meet late THIS AFTERNOON to decide if enforcement-only bills will be included in the Department of Homeland Security's appropriations package. Urge your Senators to oppose efforts to attach anti-immigration measures to this must-pass bill. Call or email your Senators TODAY - encourage them to weigh-in with Senate Appropriators about this urgent matter.

    You can find general information about the three bills below and a section-by-section analysis of each one on InfoNet.

    Email your Senators through Contact Congress on AILA's website. We've already created a sample letter for you to send. All you need to do is enter your zip code, hit send, and your voice will be heard in Congress.

    Call your Senators, you can find their telephone numbers in our Congressional Directory and you can use these talking points to help you when you call:

    � Congress should stop playing politics with immigration and pass comprehensive immigration reform. These enforcement-only bills will do nothing to enhance border security and will not move us one inch closer to fixing our broken immigration system.

    � Attaching these bills to DHS appropriations circumvents the legislative process on an issue of critical national importance; it undermines the intense and unflagging efforts of the Senate to solve this crisis; and it rewards the House for spending the summer attacking the Senate while abdicating its responsibility to the American people.

    � Senators should forcefully oppose this effort by the House to nullify the Senate's bi-partison solution. If the Senate acquiesces on these provisions, the House will only be emboldened and will never return to debate comprehensive reform. This will not be "enforcement-first", it will be "enforcement-only."

    � For laws to work, they must be realistic and fair. Our current immigration laws are neither: proposals like these that ignore the reality that immigrants come here to work and to be with their families are destined to fail.

    � Giving the government unchecked powers to punish immigrants, and making local police chase after immigrants, will only drive undocumented immigrants further underground. It will not fix the problem; it will make matters worse.

    We called you to action last week to alert you to an underhanded political strategy from immigration restrictionists to attach three enforcement-only bills to the DHS appropriations bill, a bill that must pass this year. You and your colleagues sent close to 2,000 letters to Congress, but we'll need more letters and phone calls in order to ensure that Senate Appropriators exclude these measures from the bill.

    Leaders of the U.S. House of Representatives are working behind closed doors and using procedural mechanisms to attach enforcement-only provisions contained in three bills (H.R. 6094, H.R. 6095, and H.R. 4830) to the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill, a piece of legislation that must pass this year. Although House leaders label these bills "border security" legislation, they are in fact harsh enforcement measures lifted from Rep. Sensenbrenner's H.R. 4437 that endanger due process rights and do little to make our borders more secure. You can find general information about the three bills below and a section-by-section analysis of each one on InfoNet.

    If these provisions are attached to the must-pass DHS bill, it will be nearly impossible to defeat them. Our best defense against this backdoor strategy is to put pressure on each U.S. Senator and encourage them to oppose any attempt to attach, or further these three enforcement-only bills. We're working hard in Washington to derail these political machinations, but we can't do it alone. We need your help. Please email or call both of your Senators today.

    Over the summer House leadership used dozens of faux hearings to stage public displays of aversion to immigration reform. While they kept the media busy and their restrictionist base roiled, they failed to change the minds of the majority of Americans who support a comprehensive solution to our broken immigration system. Nor did they succeed in backing down the U.S. Senators who supported S. 2611, a strong step towards comprehensive immigration reform. Now that House leaders know that the full Senate won't pass their enforcement-only agenda, they have resorted to closed-door politicking. We must fight to prevent the breach of justice that would result from attaching these enforcement-only bills to must-pass legislation.

    Please call and email your Senators today. Now is the time for action.

    Sincerely,

    Marshall


    Marshall Fitz
    Director of Advocacy, AILA
    Email Marshall



    The enforcement-only provisions are:

    � Sections 101 and 102 of the Dangerous Alien Detention Act contained in H.R. 6094, which seek to legitimize the practice of indefinite detention of aliens awaiting removal, despite Supreme Court decisions requiring elimination of this practice;

    � Section 201 of the Criminal Alien Removal Act contained in H.R. 6094, which would expand the use of expedited removal proceedings to individuals already in the United States - even individuals who have resided here for years - in ways that would significantly increase the risk of deporting innocent people;

    � Sections 301-303 of the Alien Gang Removal Act contained in H.R. 6094, which would grant unfettered discretion to the executive branch to designate "criminal street gangs" and then strip members of such gangs of virtually all rights;

    � Section 101 of H.R. 6095, which gives state and local police authority to investigate, arrest, and detain noncitizens for civil violations of immigration status;

    � Sections 301 and 302 of the Ending Catch and Release Act contained in H.R. 6095, which would limit the power of federal courts to grant injunctive relief in civil immigration proceedings, despite acknowledgement by DOJ that such relief does not interfere with efforts to end the practice of catch-and-release.




    licencia de manejo. la licencia de conducir enlicencia de manejo. la licencia de conducir en
  • la licencia de conducir en


  • singam
    12-23 08:26 PM
    Yes.



    more...

    licencia de manejo. licencias de manejolicencia de manejo. licencias de manejo
  • licencias de manejo


  • karthkc
    03-18 01:38 PM
    what is GC sponser? ABC company couldnt find a project for me. So i am on bench.

    GC Sponsor is the employer who has started your Green Card process...

    How did you get your EAD?




    licencia de manejo. una licencia de conducirlicencia de manejo. una licencia de conducir
  • una licencia de conducir


  • lj_rr
    07-09 05:25 PM
    Well. If you are planning to use EAD, it is probably not an issue.

    However if someone is transferring H1 at 7th year it has to be based on a pending labor or pending/approved I-140.
    How do you prove that you have a I-140 pending/approved without attaching the documentation?

    If 180 days have passed after I-140 approval, then there is nothing to worry about not having a copy of I-140.
    GCCovet



    more...

    licencia de manejo. con la licencia de manejo,licencia de manejo. con la licencia de manejo,
  • con la licencia de manejo,


  • eb3_nepa
    03-16 12:30 PM
    Eb3_nepa, read my post closely; read the report as well, and then post again.

    I said frivolous filing of I485, nothing to do with priority date not being current. If the priority date is not current then you are not going to get EAD. Let me give you an example. You could make up a job description that got through labor cert, but for which you don't have the qualifications for. You can concurrent file I140/I485 and get EAD even though your application has no chance of passing. If your lawyer is OK with it - after all, why do they care as long as they get the fee - you have just wasted USCIS' time.

    I am confused stucklabor. I thought that labor decided ur job qualifications etc. I mean when i applied for my I-140 (i did not file concurrently btw). I was asked more info regarding my company and all of the company documents. I wasnt being sarcastic or anything i am just trying to understand what is going on.




    licencia de manejo. LICENCIA DE CONDUCIR A1licencia de manejo. LICENCIA DE CONDUCIR A1
  • LICENCIA DE CONDUCIR A1


  • VMH_GC
    06-11 06:15 PM
    Change the title fool.. lot of ppl are waiting for this.. they might think it's OUT



    please refrain from using harsh words that would hurt others in this forum. Please respect others and treat everyone with dignity as we are all fighting for same cause.




    licencia de manejo. su licencia de conducir ylicencia de manejo. su licencia de conducir y
  • su licencia de conducir y


  • manderson
    07-13 12:51 PM
    like filing EAD and AP but not 485 (per Greg Siskind's opinion - Siskind-haters pls don't kill me!! :) )




    jliechty
    November 9th, 2004, 10:42 AM
    I have browsed at two local specialist camera stores but the only digitals were either very old or cost more than I can buy new on line.:(
    When you buy a film camera, you can "upgrade" the image quality, up to a certain point, by buying different film. With a digital SLR, you're essentially buying the camera plus a certain (but unknown) amount of "film." Any camera will fail at some point in time, but the general probability is that the shutter of a $1000 film camera will last a while longer than the shutter of a $1000 digital camera (the former would be a pro model, while the latter is basically amateur or lower end prosumer).

    What I'm not trying to do is convince you to buy a film SLR. I have one, and would upgrade to a DSLR at the drop of a hat if I could afford it. What I am attempting to caution you about, is that a used DSLR will come with no reasonable warranty, and a certain (unknown) amount of the "film" already used up. Given the apparent "free"-ness of digital capture, lots of people shoot thousands of frames per day without thinking (I have nothing against pros who need to "machine gun" it to capture the right moment in sports - this rant was against amateurs who shoot tons of frames without any thought, hoping something good may come out by chance). Thus, you have no idea how much life will be left in a used DSLR when you buy it, and more likely than not, there will be no guarantee if it does fail. It's like buying expired film on ebay... risky, but you pays your money and you takes your choice.




    rajarao
    08-19 09:32 PM
    Thanks everyone for replies.
    RFE LUD came as email on Friday. A week before, I spoke with customer service and they said my case will be forwarded to IO.
    The RFE letter came to my company lawyer today. He sent me the copy. He is also basically suggesting the same. Gather whatever available and write some explanation. He will refine and send it.

    Will keep posted on this forum.

    --------------------
    EB-2/ India/
    PD 06/2004



    No comments:

    Post a Comment