Sunday, June 12, 2011

kim kardashian before and now

images paris-kim-beach kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian Then And Now
  • Kim Kardashian Then And Now



  • trueguy
    03-06 01:10 PM
    Both are very good point. May be we should send it directly to Obama office and request him to consider.

    Can we have a letter that everybody can send out. I am sure sending thousands of letters will have more impact.

    Thanks.





    wallpaper Kim Kardashian Then And Now kim kardashian before and now. beautiful Kim Kardashian,
  • beautiful Kim Kardashian,



  • wangwei417
    05-18 12:22 PM
    Great works, guys. :o





    kim kardashian before and now. After an interview with US
  • After an interview with US



  • sanojkumar
    08-21 11:51 AM
    bumping up??





    2011 beautiful Kim Kardashian, kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian Then And Now
  • Kim Kardashian Then And Now



  • andymajumder
    12-12 03:59 PM
    It would be interesting to see though... if we have even a single person on this forum with EB2 priority date before Jan1 2000.
    Basically, that means USCIS won't issuing any EB2 india and at the end of the fiscal year we will hear of visa numbers being wasted again.



    more...


    kim kardashian before and now. After being separated from
  • After being separated from



  • snathan
    04-01 10:50 PM
    And I can't apply for a green card, I don't meet the criteria...I'd have to get married with a woman.

    you dont have to marry. just remain as illegal and they will GC sooner.





    kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian showed off a
  • Kim Kardashian showed off a



  • NKR
    04-17 02:32 PM
    Who gave you a red dot for the very first post here?


    His employer..



    more...


    kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian then and now!
  • Kim Kardashian then and now!



  • lazycis
    12-19 04:01 PM
    Multiple I-485 Filings Not Advisable
    �MurthyDotCom

    While the immigration regulations do not prohibit filing more than one I-485 for the same applicant, and the USCIS cannot provide guidance or advice for filing multiple I-485s, an applicant can adjust his or her status based only on one I-485 application. Therefore, submitting more than one filing at any given time potentially could result in problems. The USCIS could request that one set of adjustment applications be withdrawn, that the two applications be combined into one, fingerprints and security checks many not be conducted on both filings, or one set of I-485 applications could be denied. Thus, it is almost always advisable not to have multiple I-485s pending at the same time.


    I also have the information that if you have pending I-485 and will try to switch to the consular processing, I-485 will be automatically withdrawn as "duplicate" visa petition.





    2010 After an interview with US kim kardashian before and now. paris-kim-beach
  • paris-kim-beach



  • qasleuth
    07-17 11:35 AM
    If you are serious about discussing issues like this, I would suggest you take opinions/bias out of your arguments.

    All of your below listed biases are classic anti-immigrant groups' slogans.
    "unskilled/low skill immigrants cause higher unemployment", "unskilled/low skilled immigration == jobs not created, remain uneployed", "DV / Family based immigration brings in unskilled/low skilled immigrants"

    If you want a healthy discussion, do some research and provide data to support your assertions or ask for data before you make assertions. This thread will quickly turn into a bash fest against so called "unskilled" workers.

    And, how do you define "unskilled/low skilled" ? as compared to what ? A Java programmer ?

    I agree as well as dis-agree.

    numberUSA give this argument for all the immigration communities which I am sure is from a different perspective (xenophobic or race). They just don't want any immigrants no matter what.

    I am talking only about this crisis and merely from economic point of view. About choosing based upon what is good for the economy and what is not.

    Thanks,
    M.



    more...


    kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian can now
  • Kim Kardashian can now



  • pani_6
    01-16 05:17 PM
    Letter is attached
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22793





    hair Kim Kardashian Then And Now kim kardashian before and now. 2003 efore attending
  • 2003 efore attending



  • Ramba
    03-26 12:16 PM
    no, it is not the same position. the two positins have 2 different classifications and requirements. the first position (I have LC certified for) is a financial analyst which requires a bachelor degree. the second position is a senior financial analyst (for which LC was denied) which requires a masters degree and it is supervisory position. I asked my employer to request masters + 2 years experience for the senior position but lawyer said that my experience was acquired while working for the employer (while I was working as a financial analyst) so that experience can not count toward the senior position. this was a genuine promotion and not just to apply for EB2.

    any feedback is appreciated.

    May be those are two different position. But both are same occupational classification as per SOC/ONET. The employer can not request BS and MS for same occupational class. Conventionaly, the senior/supervisor level will be achived by experience in the occupation not by education.



    more...


    kim kardashian before and now. We are loving Kim Kardashian#39;s
  • We are loving Kim Kardashian#39;s



  • seeking_GC
    07-28 02:08 PM
    Hi Everyone,
    My I140 which has been approved for more than 4 years now was transferred from Texas to Nebraska.

    Trying to find the method in USCIS madness - has this happened to anyone else also and any reason why they might suddenly have decided to do this?

    One reason I can think of is my 485s are in NE so maybe they are trying to consolidate all information in one file??

    Appreciate peoples inputs.





    hot After being separated from kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian Then And Now
  • Kim Kardashian Then And Now



  • bbct
    05-02 10:56 AM
    The IO will not issue an I-94 with the expiry date same as the new approval notice end date. You will be given an I-94 with the expiry date same as the visa expiry date on the passport. If you are using AP to enter, you will be given an expiry date of 1-year from the date of entry.

    My wife travelled in July 2007 on H4 when my H1B was expiring on 09/30/2007. She showed the approval notice that was valid till 09/30/2010 and was still given the I-94 valid till 09/30/2007.

    Should not be an issue. Dont forget to give the approval notice to the IO. Otherwise you will be given only till Aug 2009.



    more...


    house Kim Kardashian gives Paris a kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian: Hi, Brody.
  • Kim Kardashian: Hi, Brody.



  • kurtz_wolfgang
    08-15 01:30 PM
    Probably because Lot of people in IV are hurting because of people who jumped the line by using somebody else�s LC and people are getting ahead of some one who are there in line for 6-8 years.\

    I am NOT the one who gave you red. I never give anyone red even if i don't like the post..

    I will just give you my "green"

    Thanks SKD.....I appreciate your green.

    Lot of people in IV are hurting because of people who jumped the line by using somebody else�s LC.
    >> I agree with that, but it was not intended. Actually when I applied for substitute labor, I didnt know what was the importance of GC. I applied within 15 days, of my arrival in usa, since my employer asked me to (for financial purpose). I woe the day I signed the papers. My life has been (worse than hell) at the mercy of my employer. I came here temporary, thinking will enjoy life here in USA for a few years. You don't have such issues in Europe.





    tattoo Kim Kardashian showed off a kim kardashian before and now. Yes, the angle makes Kim look
  • Yes, the angle makes Kim look



  • waiting_4_gc
    07-27 03:30 PM
    You can't write 01/01/1995. In that case your check will be invalidated. Check expires after 180 days. :D :D

    But you are correct for RD :)


    Umm, what if USCIS takes more than 180 days to encash the checks?

    Do we have to re-file the application/re-send the check?:confused:



    more...


    pictures Kim Kardashian then and now! kim kardashian before and now. kim kardashian
  • kim kardashian



  • chinta_ramesh
    08-21 11:57 AM
    It seems they want to make some progress before updating the dates :rolleyes:





    dresses Kim Kardashian Then And Now kim kardashian before and now. Daughter Kim Kardashian and
  • Daughter Kim Kardashian and



  • supers789
    08-05 04:44 PM
    very frustrating.. Aug is here, and my PD is current now (using old employer 140).. but cannot file 485 since fragomen-PERM stuck in audit for current employer!!!

    I was waiting for PD to become current for almost 2-3 years.. at old employer... now its current.. and i cannot do anything... !!!! just wait and watch!!.. Audit result expected in 6-8 month per fragomen.. 6 years of h1b expiring in 10 months!



    more...


    makeup Kim Kardashian can now kim kardashian before and now. Kim Kardashian gives Paris a
  • Kim Kardashian gives Paris a



  • vin13
    01-16 12:17 PM
    The pay need not be exactly same. You can make more. There is no guide line. For example if you made 60K and now you have a job where you make 300K, then it would be hard to say it is the same kind of job.

    Employees get yearly pay increase, or when they move they may make more. You need not have to say no if you get a pay increase. :)

    Do not get me wrong, but you seem to have very basic questions. Send me your phone number on a private message and maybe i can clear some of your doubts.





    girlfriend Yes, the angle makes Kim look kim kardashian before and now. So now Kim Kardashian is going
  • So now Kim Kardashian is going



  • javadeveloper
    07-26 04:51 PM
    If I am not wrong your EAD/AP will not be processed until after your I140 is approved.Maybe some one comment on this

    You can get EAD even if your I-140 is pending.Correct me if I am wrong.





    hairstyles We are loving Kim Kardashian#39;s kim kardashian before and now. Reggie Bush, Kim Kardashian
  • Reggie Bush, Kim Kardashian



  • sidbee
    01-02 08:01 PM
    I really wish , i could file my 485 in 2 years, If not i am moving to UK.
    Another question , being a junior i have, How does IV use our donations to compel USCIS/DOS to do things in favour of LEGAL IMMIGRANTS?





    seahawks
    07-22 10:14 PM
    5 star rating from me





    Mohit_Malkani
    10-08 11:13 AM
    Sorry to hear about your situation.

    Take a look at www.immigtation-law.com. Go to the nreaking news swction. They have a great piece on I140/I485 portability.

    I have also pasted it here in case you dont get to the website

    All the best.

    10/08/2007: I-140 Portability After 180 Days of 485 Filing and Service Centers Standard Procedure of Review and Adjudication

    When there is a retrogression of visa numbers and anticipated long delays in 485 adjudication due to the massive July VB fiasco 485 filings, it is anticipated that there will be a substantial number of 485 applicants who may have to change employment along the way, either voluntarily or involuntarily, under AC 21 Section 106(c) provision. Accordingly, whether one reports the change of employment proactively or not, one should learn the internal review and adjudication procedures within the Service Center which are adopted by the adjudicators in adjudicating such I-485 applications.
    The good material to review on this procedure is the USCIS Standard Operating Procedure for the adjudicators. The SOP states that "If the alien is using the portability provisions of AC21 106(c), the adjudicator must determine that both the ported labor certification and the ported I-140 are still valid under the current employer, especially in regards to the continual payment of the prevailing wage, similar occupation classification, and the employer�s ability to pay the prevailing wage."
    (1) Prevailing Wage Payment: The AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer pays the prevailing wage or higher wage for portability. However, the adjudicators review the wage as part of their determination of "continuing validity" of the ported certified labor certification application and I-140 petition. When the applicant stays with the same employer without changing employer, payment of wage less than the prevailing wage should not present any serious issue inasmuch as the employer establishes that the employer was financially able to pay the prevailing wage and is continuously able to pay the prevailing wage until the green card is approved. However, when there is a change of employer who pays less than the prevailing wage, there is no clear-cut rule with reference to this issue. Payment of less than prevailing wage thus potentially can raise two issues when there is a change of employer. One is the adjudicator's argument that there is no continuing validity of the labor certification or I-140 petition. The other is the argument that different wage reflects that the labor certification job and the new job with the new employer are two different occupational classifications.
    (2) Similar occupational classification issue: The similarity of the two positions involves not the "jobs" but "occupational classification." Accordingly, the old and new positions do not necessarily have to match exactly in every details, especially specific skill sets. Currently, the USCIS is looking up the Labor Department SOC/OES classifications of occupations. When the two jobs fall under the same occupational classification in the DOL occupational definitions, the two jobs are generally considered "similar" occupational classification. As long as the two jobs belong to a similar occupational classification, the applicant can work for the new employer anywhere in the United States. There is no physically location restrictions.
    (3) Employer's financial ability to pay the wage: Again, AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer must prove that the new employer has and will have a financial ability to pay the prevailing wage. However, the adjudicators appear to review the portability case considering the new employer's ability to pay as well as part of review of continuing vality of labor certification and I-140 petition.
    Remember that when there is a portability issue, two things can ensure. If one proactively reports the eligibility of portability meeting all the foregoing requirment, the adjudicators are likely to decide the pending I-485 application on the merit. However, if the 485 applicants do not report proactively change of employment and the USCIS somehow obtains information of the alien's change of employment, for instance, by employer's report of termination of employment or withdrawal of I-140 petition or substitution of alien beneficiary, then 485 applicants are likely to be served a notice of intent to deny I-485 applications or in most cases, the adjudicator transfers the I-485 file to the local district office for interview.
    In AC 21 106(c) portability situation, the adjudicators also review the issue of the continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition involving the original employer, and are likely to raise similar issues which are described above. However, when the alien ports with the "approved" I-140 petition with a copy of the last paycheck and W-2, the adjudicators rarely revisit the original employer's foregoing issues in determining the 140 portability issue. The issues are raised when the alien ports before the I-140 petition is approved. Under the Yates Memorandum, when the alien ports before I-140 petition is approved, the alien has a burden of proof that the I-140 petition was approvable. Accordingly, inasmuch as I-140 petition was approvable and the alien ports after 180 days of I-485 filing, even if the original employer withdraws the I-140 petition, the pending I-485 will not be affected. Yates Memorandum indicates that in such a circumstance, the adjudicator should adjudicate the pending I-140 petition and if finds approvable, then recognizes 106(c) portability and continues to adjudicate the pending I-485 application. Without doubt, in the foregoing situation, the adjudicator will intensively and carefully review the issue of continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition issues which are specified above, particularly the employer's financial ability to pay the wage, and the applicant will have to overcome tremendous hurdles to deal with the challenges by the USCIS. Accordingly, people should not port before I-140 petition is approved unless they are assured that the original employer will continuously cooperate and support his/her green card process.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment