Wednesday, June 8, 2011

kim kardashian and kris humphries_14

kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. (Chris Humphries 14 | )
  • (Chris Humphries 14 | )



  • aries
    09-24 09:26 PM
    Hi All,

    NSC received my I765 applications on June 21st. I am still waiting for my EAD. I have seen many people from NSC got their approval for the same time frame. Is there anypone in the same boat. Is this something I should be worried about.

    Thanks!





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian and Kris
  • Kim Kardashian and Kris



  • taxila
    10-17 03:10 PM
    Hi ArunAntonio,

    I recently booked a visa appointment for my daughter at Chennai consulate. You need to fill both I-156 and I-157. The problem you are facing may be due to pop up blocking. Disable the pop up blocker for the vfs site. It may work. It worked for me.

    All the best.





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian and Kris
  • Kim Kardashian and Kris



  • mnq1979
    06-26 03:32 PM
    What did u provid as of now?? If can obtain bc u can produce it. If u do not have one then ceritificate of non-availability. Besides this u need to produce secendary evidences such as school, medical and religious documents or affidavits which mentions both your parents and your full names. That is what I did. In anycase, you will be given instructions on the rfe what to respond to the rfe. Good luck.

    I jsut spoke to my mom and she confirmed that she has my BC in diffrent language and will get it translated. So i think i m good from that part.

    But my wife BC is not available. I have asked my father in law and he said he will ask some one to get. It is possible but will take a little time.

    My question is since her BC will be made NOW do i need any other proof with her BC?





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian and Kris
  • Kim Kardashian and Kris



  • TO BE OR NO TO BE
    05-17 03:49 PM
    nshah:

    Can you give me information of your lawyer please?

    Thanks,



    more...


    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian and Kris
  • Kim Kardashian and Kris



  • txh1b
    08-25 02:33 PM
    AC21 is complicated enough and you need to have a qualified lawyer (get a second opinion from one) if your company lawyer is the only one that is looking at it.

    1. These seem different to me and I am sure the job descriptions under the ONET page would also be different for these SOC codes. This would mean your AC21 will be risky.
    2. This sounds more like a same/similar position.
    3. You could do that. Your employer should be ready to give you a letter that your profferred position upon approval of GC is an Engineer position. If there is any mention of a manager, USCIS may be wondering why anyone would take a demotion (sorta) after the GC is approved.
    4. You can but employer tailoring the description to fit your needs might be bordering to fraud.
    5. a. You will retain your old PD.
    b. This is a gray area. You are technically not qualifying under AC21 however, it is possible as AC21 filing is not mandatory. If your case gets in audit, you will run the risk. Calculate the risk/reward and act.
    6. This sounds repetitive as #3.





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian and Kris
  • Kim Kardashian and Kris



  • Loruoo26
    02-14 12:47 PM
    Everyone is entitled to have an opinion. When it comes to opinions, though, there's a difference between the majority wow gold (http://www.wowpl.de), of people and celebrities like actors, athletes, and rock stars. If you're an average person, only your family and friends care about your opinion. If you’re famous, the whole world listens, or so it seems sometimes. Is this the way if should be? I don't think so.   We shouldn't pay attention to famous people's opinions just because of who they are. Being a famous basketball player doesn't make someone an expert on environmental issues. However, that basketball player has a better opportunity to be heard than most wow gold (http://www.wowleveln.de), people do. If that player feels very strongly about an issue, he can use his fame to draw attention to it and get other people involved. That way they can saw attention and needed dollars to that issue.   People who are rich put their money behind a cause. In the same way, famous people are using their most valuable asset. In their case, it's not money. It's their name recognition. Should people pay attention to what they think just because of who maple story powerleveling (http://www.maplestorymesosshop.com/maple-story-power-leveling.asp), they are? I don’t think so. I also don't think we should discount what they think just because of who they are. They have a right to their opinion. If their name draws people to that cause, all the better for the cause.   I think too often we categories people and try to keep them in their place. maple story powerleveling (http://www.maplestorymesosstore.com/maple-story-power-leveling.asp), Celebrities have brains and should be allowed to use them. When they're advocating a cause, their opinion should be just one of many factors we use to evaluate that cause.Everyone is entitled to have an opinion. When maple story powerleveling (http://www.mesosoon.com/maple-story-power-leveling.asp),it comes to opinions, though, there's a difference between the majority of people and celebrities like actors, athletes, and rock stars. If you're an average person, only your family and friends care about your opinion. If you’re famous, the whole world listens, or so it seems sometimes. Is this the way if should be? I don't think so.   We shouldn't pay attention to famous people's opinions just because of who they are. Being a famous basketball player doesn't make someone an expert on environmental issues. However, that basketball player has a better opportunity to be heard than most people do. If that player feels very strongly about an issue, he can use his fame to draw attention to it and get other people involved. That way they can saw attention and needed dollars to that issue.   People who are rich put their money behind a cause. In the same way, famous people are using their most valuable asset. In their case, it's not money. It's their name recognition. Should people pay attention to what they think just because of who they are? I don’t think so. I also don't think we should discount what they think just because of who they are. They have a right to their opinion. If their name draws people to that cause, all the better for the cause.   I think too often we categories people and try to keep them in their place. Celebrities have brains and should be allowed to use them. When they're advocating a cause, their opinion should be just one of many factors we use to evaluate that cause.



    more...


    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian and Kris
  • Kim Kardashian and Kris



  • dan19
    10-08 11:14 AM
    Hi..

    Sorry to hear about that. My opinion is that you are safe as long as your company doesn't withdraw/request to revoke you I-140.

    >>>>>My questions are the following:

    1. What is USCIS view when they see the new H1B transfer petition? Will they reject my I-485?

    >> No. Because I-485 is filed for a future employment.

    2. If I take a job with Company B, starting Nov 17, can I use AC21 and send in the letter after January 15 (180 days pending).

    >> You don't have to sent any letters. Only thing you need to make sure is that you current company doesn't revoke your I-140 before Jan 15. If USCIS asks you for an updated employment letter before Jan 15, you will be in trouble (normally they wont do). If they ask after Jan 15, you can provide it from the new company.

    3. Do I have any other options here (I dont have EAD yet, just applied last week)

    Once you get EAD and Jan 15 comes, inform your new company that you are using EAD for AC21 purpose. From that time, they need to support your I-485.

    Again, again, again...I am not an attorney. So consult an attorney before making any decisions.





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian ile New Jersey
  • Kim Kardashian ile New Jersey



  • bharol
    07-05 02:00 AM
    Is this for sport or for self-protection, if you don't mind me asking. What kind of gun would it be? Just curious.

    For self protection.

    However I have no clue about Guns... I am thinking about asking the Gun store owner and get more info about them.

    For me Guns are like a computer is to my 90 years old Grandpa!



    more...


    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. (Does Kim Kardashian W)
  • (Does Kim Kardashian W)



  • aaaa4321
    08-31 10:01 AM
    Hey guys I guess now interim EAD is possible if application is pending for 75 days.Got this information on murthy's site(In weekly Bulletin).Below is the link
    http://www.murthy.com/bulletin.html
    I hope I understood it correctly.
    What do all of you say?





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. (Kim Kardashian Out Wi)
  • (Kim Kardashian Out Wi)



  • ilovestirfries
    07-06 10:28 AM
    I thought that Kaiser was only for Western States. Is it there for other places also?

    A little peek into Kaiser's website will help you a long way in answering your basic questions...

    Here is the info. about their locations,

    http://members.kaiserpermanente.org/kpweb/toc.do?theme=locate_members

    Here is their website, where you can do "SEARCH" before you ask any kind of basic questions,

    http://www.kaiserpermanente.org/



    more...


    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup smokey; kim kardashian makeup smokey. emw. Nov 21, 04:44 PM. Interesting concept, but their website
  • kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup smokey; kim kardashian makeup smokey. emw. Nov 21, 04:44 PM. Interesting concept, but their website



  • cbpds
    06-01 07:00 PM
    Cant agree with you more, the below request should be dealt with separately instead of been clubbed with other major issues( akin to legal immigration clubbed with CIR), will need Congress approval though.

    Request IV to highlight this issue separately as it will surely help a small section hanging between H1 and EAD, who are not in the "safe" zone.

    There should be boat load of people who have their I140 approved and stuck. Irrespective of the population, it is important that this be addressed. They are one job away from loosing status. By issuing a 3 year employer independent EAD before a PR number becomes available is worthy cause. By this way, everyone in the pipeline knows that someday their paperwork will be cleared for good and until then they have the EAD to keep them going. The very fact that an I140 has been approved for a petitioner and the intent to immigrate has been approved, should allow the petitioner the temporary relief of having the choice to work and live little better. The the only thing that is preventing your status validated is the availability of Visa number, which is more of a procedural/legislative issue. So, hope this request is pushed in one or another form.





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. Watabou. Apr 30, 04:43 PM. You just made his point
  • kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. Watabou. Apr 30, 04:43 PM. You just made his point



  • grupak
    08-15 07:40 PM
    Thank you all for the good wishes!

    Good to see you Jazz.

    Congratulation,


    You said relocated- Did you invoke AC21 and if so, did you inform
    USCIS about your new employer/job? Please, let us know on this


    My GC came before I officially joined the new employer. And NIW is a bit grey area I think... I don't need an employer but I am expected to continue my contribution in my field of expertise.

    But as people have mentioned AC21 is your right... you don't have to invoke it. If USCIS asks, you prove through documentation how you are covered under AC21.



    more...


    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. kim kardashian makeup lesson. Kim Kardashian Makeup Lesson. Kim Kardashian Makeup Lesson. sgosine. Jun 19, 12:41 AM. Can#39;t imagine how pricey those cards
  • kim kardashian makeup lesson. Kim Kardashian Makeup Lesson. Kim Kardashian Makeup Lesson. sgosine. Jun 19, 12:41 AM. Can#39;t imagine how pricey those cards



  • Ann Ruben
    06-22 12:10 PM
    There are really two questions here. First, are you eligible for unemployment compensation? And second, will applying for unemployment compensation adversely impact your application for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident?


    The answer to the first question is controlled by the law of the particular state in which you worked and/or reside. In theory, to be eligible one must have worked long enough that an adequate amount of UC insurance was paid into the UC system, AND one must be willing and ABLE to accept new employment. The law varies from state to state with respect to whether someone in your situation qualifies as "ABLE" to accept new employment.

    As to the second question, (assuming your I-140 has been approved and your I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days) under the INA, when your PD is reached and your I-485 is adjudicated, you are required to have the intention to take up an offer of permanent full time employment in the same or similar occupation for which your LC was granted. This is a prospective requirement, and your employment status prior to the actual grant of AOS is relevant only to the extent that it supports or undercuts your ability to prove that you have an appropriate offer of full time employment which you intend to take up. There is no requirement that you be employed while you are waiting for your priority date to become current and your I-485 to be adjudicated. However, being unemployed or employed in an entirely unrelated occupation could trigger USCIS to perform a more searching inquiry into the bona fides of the prospective AC21 qualifying job offer and your intention to accept it.

    To the best of my knowledge, USCIS is not notified when an AOS applicant applies for UC. Similarly, I am not aware of any cases where an UC claim triggered an RFE. Nevertheless, it would be prudent to act on the assumption that USCIS is aware of UC claims and be well prepared to prove one's intention to take up a bona fide offer of AC 21 qualifying employment once your PD is reached.





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Kim Kardashian and Kris
  • Kim Kardashian and Kris



  • CCC2006
    09-12 10:06 AM
    A friend of mine sent me this link to find ur status after the 45 day letter.

    http://www.pbls.doleta.gov/pbls_pds.cfm

    The site says : The backlog public disclosure system only accepts Case numbers beginning with either a D or P.
    Please enter the case number with all dashes.
    Where the # represents a number
    (e.g. P-#####-##### OR D-#####-##### ).

    Unfortunately I dont have the number and the lawyer is not giving it to me. If this can help u guyz please do use it.



    more...


    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. soLoredd. Aug 19, 05:25 PM. Well, not working here in Central
  • kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson. soLoredd. Aug 19, 05:25 PM. Well, not working here in Central



  • raysaikat
    01-20 07:47 PM
    According to federal law, if you've had coverage for 6 months prior to changing your coverage to the new insurance, they can't refuse to cover pre existing conditions. They may try, I just had to fight this out with CIGNA. They lost. However if you let your coverage lapse, you can get hit with this.

    If you are talking about HIPAA, then that generally applies to group plans (offered by your employer), not individual plans that we are talking about in this thread.





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup smokey; kim kardashian makeup smokey. Rtamp;Dzine. Apr 8, 10:04 PM
  • kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup smokey; kim kardashian makeup smokey. Rtamp;Dzine. Apr 8, 10:04 PM



  • lp2007
    11-01 05:31 PM
    I think she should not have any problem with her future visits.

    My mother visits every year and spends 6 months with us since the last 6 yrs and never had an issue. She extended her stay one time.

    One of my friends mother was given a 3 month stamp one yr during b'coz she had extended her previous visit and stayed 3 months already in the same year. So the officer told her she could only stay for 6 months in any given yr, but later she extended and stayed longer and has visited US 2 times after that without any issues.

    USCIS takes between 6 weeks to <nn> weeks to process the request.

    One important thing you want to take care is, U need to send original i-94 card while requesting extension of stay and when u leave i-94 has to be returned at the airport. If your mom-in-law leaves before the application is approved, you want to be sure to save the extention documnets and mail the i-94 card back. And make sure to carry the extension approvals next time she travels so there is no confusion about unauthorized over stay. This happened with my mom. We received her approval after she had already left. So I mailed her approval to her prior to her next visit and she was fine.

    I hope this helps.



    more...


    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. Do you really expect a child to understand the difference between play money and real money? kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson.
  • Do you really expect a child to understand the difference between play money and real money? kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup lesson.



  • tikka
    08-07 07:56 PM
    and bump///





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup. kim
  • kim kardashian makeup lesson. kim kardashian makeup. kim



  • django.stone
    01-25 07:49 PM
    Last week, Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) introduced the Bipartisan Reform of Immigration through Good Enforcement Resolution in the lower house of Congress. According to Congressman Chaffetz, the resolution does three things: � make E-Verify mandatory for all employers, and hold employees accountable as well; � provide sufficient border infrastructure and manpower to secure and control our borders; and, � reject amnesty and any legal status which pardons those here in violation of our laws. At first I thought this was the usual anti-immigrant measure we expect to see from the folks in the Immigration Reform Caucus. But an interview with...

    More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/compromises-coming-on-immigration-reform.html)

    With democrats in disarray, they would be even afraid of saying the 3 letter word CIR. nothing this year, an election year, so let's start thinking about 2011!. isn't this sad :(





    kim kardashian and kris humphries_14. kim kardashian makeup lesson. Makeup Lesson: Kim Kardashian
  • kim kardashian makeup lesson. Makeup Lesson: Kim Kardashian



  • yestogc
    11-17 02:26 PM
    using AP with H1B will not affect your h1b status in anyway.

    Go with what roseball said ..................... 100% true





    diptam
    09-07 08:14 AM
    Which company will create a new PERM and new I-140 for someone in this economy ? The chances of rejection are high , the audit chance is also hanging...

    That was exactly my plan 2.5 years ago when i applied for my I-140 and I-485 in 2007 (PD is Mar '05 EB3) however USCIS approved my I-140 in Jan 2009 which was too late. The economy was already in deep recession with unemployment sky rocketing. If my I-140 approval would have come 6 months earlier ( before Lehmann broke) I would have pulled through a new PERM and new I-140.

    Anyway , that's what i was destined so I didn't get I-140 in regular time frame. :)

    If you can try for it that will make your GC faster.





    petersebastian
    03-31 05:49 PM
    Your 180 days start from the day your I-94 expired. And yes, 2 weeks or 4 weeks over stay will make a difference. Next time when you enter the country or at the Visa office they might ask you the reason.

    You did nit clarify if your partner is a US citizen, PR or visa holder. That might help in giving you some additional advise.

    He's American. I am aware that they will ask about that but I just want to make it clear that I'm facing a 3 year ban after overstaying the 180 days after my I94 expiration date (so the end of July in my case).



    No comments:

    Post a Comment