Friday, June 10, 2011

football boots nike mercurial 2010

images 2010 Nike Mercurial Vapor football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Superfly II
  • Nike Mercurial Superfly II



  • admin
    01-29 11:50 AM
    Earlier many of us were happy that as per AILA's report, the effect of retrogression might be significantly reduced. Now lawyer Mathew Oh has come out with the some analysis as to why this exuberance might be showtlived and why we need to fight for legislative reform with respect to Employment Based Green Cards. So remember "It aint over till its over".

    Here is an excerpt of his analysis from http://www.immigration-law.com/


    The State Department's new prediction is derived from two changed circumstances. One is the slow-down of I-485 adjudications by the USCIS and the resultant decrease of the EB visa numbers demand on the part of the USCIS. The second factor is the delays in processing of the old labor certification cases in the Backlog Eliminination Centers of the DOL. It is not clear what has caused the decreased visa number demand from the USCIS EB-485 proceedings, but it may have something to do with the on-going reengineering of the USCIS processing and adjudication system. As for the Backlog Elimination Centers, they have yet to complete the ground work of data entry and 45-day letters, before they can focus on adjudication of the backlog applications. Currently, the USCIS is scheduled to complete the reengineering by the end of September 2006 and the DOL is scheduled to complete the ground work of data entries and 45-day letter processing by approximately the end of June 2006. As we reported earlier, a substantial number of these BEC cases are known to be 245(i) cases, meaning that the cases were filed in traditional regular application type of EB-3 in most cases on or before April 30, 2001. A substantial number of these cases have yet to go through the "supervised" recruitment process to complete the labor certification processing and it will take a substantial period of time before these cases will move into the USCIS I-485 processing system.

    From the foregoing analysis, one can predict that the big winners of the new prediction may include (1) those old priority date I-485 cases pending before the USCIS including 245(i) cases which may be approved within next several months; (2) those old priority date I-140 cases pending before the USCIS which may at least move into the I-485 phase and getting the benefits of EAD, AP, and AC 21 change of employment eligibility; and (3) those old priority date backlog labor certification cases which can move into the I-140/I-485 concurrent filing phase upon approval of the delayed backlog labor certification processing with the ancillary benefits that come along with the filing of I-485 applications such as EAD, AP, and AC-21 change of employment benefits. It is anticipated that the cases under the foregoing (3) may remain very limited in numbers due to the BEC processing delays.

    The real losers may turn out to be those with late priority dates. Once the USCIS reengineering work is completed by the end of this fiscal year and the BECs start processing backlog cases en masse around the end of this fical year, the stream of visa number demand will move into the State Department visal allocation system. The pressure to the allocation system will mount tremendously as time passes, and unless the Comprehensive Immigration Reform legislation brings a cure to the current ailing immigrant visa quota system within this year, it is likely that these late priority date cases may experience tremendous difficulties due to the stand-still or further retrogression of the visa numbers and the resultant unavailability of the ancillary benefits of EAD, AP, and AC 21 change of employment opportunities. It is anticipated that the real crisis may be witnessed beginning the end of this calendar year as by that time it is anticipated that the BECs are expected to pump out certifications of backlog cases.

    It is thus obvious that the new prediction of the State Department can turn out to be a short-lived relief for a limited number of immigrants and a sign of foreseeable dark cloud and storm moving into the visa number system for most of the immigrants. The only answer to the clogged employment-based immigration system lies with the reform of the employment-based immigrant quota allocation system and related reform, including but not limited to (1) dependants immigration without taking out visa numbers from the employment-based quota system and (2) eligibility of I-485 applications for those who attained the labor certification approvals or I-140 petitions even during the period of visa number unavailability. For these reasons, the immigrant community should not stop its efforts to bring back (1) the legislative proposals which were reflected in the failed Section 8001 and 8002 of S. 1932 and (2) the adjustment of EB-immigrant quota substantially upward as reflected in the McCain-Kennedy bill.





    wallpaper Nike Mercurial Superfly II football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly
  • Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly



  • immigrant2007
    05-18 07:26 PM
    This lawsuit is about the 140000 visas been given out each year and in years 2008 and 2009.

    There have been many people who received GCs in 2008 and 2009 in EB2 without regard to Priority number. Check Visa Bulletins from August 2008 and September 2008. People from 2006 were given GCs over 2004 and there was total chaos.

    This lawsuit is to bring justice to the last three years of absolute anarchy.

    This lawsuit is to bring in line how this 140000 number is distributed. How does processing of I-485s take place in USCIS.

    I think Indian EB3 will join shortly.

    Why are you stopping at 2007? Issues stared much before that.
    Why do you forget the getting details of each and every VISA that was issued between 2003 and 2007 (days of backlog elimination center)? We hae a right to know that. I doubt EB based guys got benefit out of it....I do not think USCIS /DOS will ever reveal those numbers truthfully and even with 50% accuracy....
    They just put almost every True Employment based applicant in backlog and gave GCs to 245i....I dont think that was justice. That was manipulation





    football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial
  • football boots nike mercurial



  • freakin_gc
    11-14 03:19 PM
    I dont have any hope that I will be receiving GC soon...my I-140 is still pending at NSC and unfortunately I'm from India ;(

    PD AUG 2004(EB3)
    140 Pending RD June 26th, 2007
    485 Pending RD Aug 13, 2007
    EAD APPROVED Oct 26, 2007
    FP DONE SEPT Oct 20, 2007
    AP APPROVED Nov 2, 2007





    2011 Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly



  • drirshad
    09-27 08:23 PM
    And the oldies r gonna retire creating more jobs what will they do then, i m sure somethin goin on to make us suffer especially ..........



    more...


    football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. Save: 42% off. Nike Mercurial
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. Save: 42% off. Nike Mercurial



  • wizkid732
    08-26 07:47 AM
    Thanks overseas.
    Just curious... has your case been approved?
    I got a letter to the ombudsman's query to USCIS. They clearly mentioned that it was in a name check/background check process and it might take time.

    They threw in some words like, that kind of checks resulted in sex crimes, terrorist links and violent crimes etc so that no one will question the time i suppose.

    I have been at wrong place at wrong time. I applied for the GC in 2001 and never passed the labor stage till mid 2005 (NY cases stuck in Apr 2001 forever, my company shut down).

    I applied on a different labor substitution in 2005 when and got denied as the employer applied the labor to more than one case. I think this might be the reason for the name check. I started clean again in sept 2005 and it is pending thus far.

    I used the AC 21 and moved on after the 2007 fiasco. 5 yrs in the US is a long time as far as the employment goes :-).


    wizkid732,

    My case is in background check a.k.a extended review. I tried all the means without any success. Infopass, Ombudsman and senator told me that there is no time limit for these kind of cases. Few unlucky cases gets stuck in this and yes the wait will be very painful if you wait. Best thing is followup every 3 months or so and only think about it on the day or two you followed up.

    On the other hand I heard about about few cases where USCIS has told that the application is in extended review but issued the card within a month or so. So I think sometimes they just say that to reduce the enquires temporarily and I hope yours is one of those cases.





    football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. Save: 42% off. Nike Mercurial
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. Save: 42% off. Nike Mercurial



  • theconfused
    04-02 10:21 PM
    Hey Dontcareanymore,

    You are right.

    For other folks, here is the summary -

    1) Got H1B visa stamp valid from August 2007 till August 2010.

    2) Started working from October 2007 and Was laid off in November 2007.

    3) Joined a consultant (IT) in December 2007. Got the training but never pursued any job as did not like the IT field.

    4) Found another job in my field (chemical engineering), filed for H1B (premium processing). Got approved without change of status in March 2008 (I-797B) .

    6) Attorney said that i have an almost brand new H1B visa so don't have to get a new visa but have to bring myself back into status by re-entering into US. Did that in April 2008. Total number of out of status days = 134. Started working for this employer from April till 30 September 2008.

    7) Found another job. Changed the job. Got the I-797A (with I-94). Working with them since October 2008. This new petition is valid from 1 October 2008 till 30 September 2011.

    8) Came to New Delhi for visa stamping on 25th Feb 2010. Had almost 20 to 30 minutes long interview.

    9) First VO asked normal questions such was job duties, salary, last 3 pay stub, W2 form etc.

    10) Then VO found out from the form DS 160 that i have checked on 'out of status' checkbox. She asked what happened. I explained it.

    11) She went to consult someone else. Came back and gave me back all the documents and asked that someone will call me on another counter.

    12) Another lady called me on different counter after 30 minutes. She sounded friendly and gave me a 221 g form (pink). She told me that it will take 6 to 8 weeks to finish the admin processing.

    13) 221 g form had questions like resume, thesis, publication, last 5 travels in US etc.

    14) I asked the lady if i can go back on my current valid visa and new I-797A. She went to consult with someone else and said that yes i can go back if i want to and the embassy will shoot me an email when they need the passport for visa stamping.

    15) With my best judgment, I left India for US on 3rd March 2010. At POE (Chicago), forwarded my passport (work visa valid till August 2010) with the I-797 A (valid till September 2011). CBP officer gave me the I-94 valid till September 2011.

    16) On 16th March 2010, got an email from embassy that they need my passport.

    17) I asked if they have received the clearance. They sent me back the automated message that they need my passport.

    18) Called DOS to know the status. They said that they can only see on their system the information submitted by the embassy and not beyond that. And the latest information embassy submitted was that they need my passport. The also mentioned that they don't have any idea why the embassy needs my passport. And 221 g is not cleared yet.

    19) With best of my abilities, made a decision to go back to India and submit the passport to vfs.

    20) Came to India on 29th March 2010 (early AM) and submitted the passport on the same day.

    21) Passport was sent back to me on 1st April 2010 with the visa stamped.

    22) The new Visa expiration date is 29th March 2012 while I-797A expiration date is September 2011. Why is it so i do not know.

    23) Checked the status on the New Delhi embassy website for 221g and it still says that the case is pending though i have received the visa stamp. It indicates that embassy folks do not update the case status report for 221 g.

    Please feel free to ask any question.

    Thanks a lot to all of you reading this...



    more...


    football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial
  • football boots nike mercurial



  • makemygc
    08-03 10:22 PM
    USCIS press release states that it has issued I-485 receipts upto July 11 2007
    and for Texas upto June 26, 2007
    Any link?





    2010 football boots nike mercurial football boots nike mercurial 2010. 2010 Nike Mercurial Vapor
  • 2010 Nike Mercurial Vapor



  • senk1s
    06-19 12:05 PM
    A quick question:
    I just have the FRONT side copy of the EAD stored.
    Why do we need the BACK side of the copy?

    Responses will be appreciated.

    It is mentioned specifically in the 765 instructions ... see on Pg 6

    http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765instr.pdf



    more...


    football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly



  • gc_on_demand
    07-14 10:47 AM
    I am aware of that backlog but just want to apply as a backup. I just want to know if applying for I 130 while I 140 is approved is there any conflict ?





    hair football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. oots nike mercurial 2010,
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. oots nike mercurial 2010,



  • GotGoose?
    04-08 03:14 PM
    Ok, I have added anti-aliasing to one of them and I think it looks better.
    Tell me what you think!

    http://img93.exs.cx/img93/5972/goosestamp6uq.gif



    more...


    football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. oots nike mercurial 2010,
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. oots nike mercurial 2010,



  • boston_gc
    09-24 08:21 PM
    If you need to retain your PD, does the job description need to be similar or can it be different?





    hot football boots nike mercurial 2010. Save: 42% off. Nike Mercurial football boots nike mercurial 2010. Football Boots gt; Nike
  • Football Boots gt; Nike



  • dpp
    06-11 08:58 AM
    I am also from Indy, please let me know if there are any meetings related to IV activities.



    more...


    house Football Boots Nike MERCURIAL football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. these football boots a run
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. these football boots a run



  • absaarkhan
    01-31 12:06 PM
    I-94 validity given by immigration officer over-rides the I-797 I-94 validity

    Yes the I-94 given by the Immigration Officer Overrides the I-94 Validity Issued by
    USCIS with your I-797. This is Per the "Last Action Rule".
    When you Entered US on your Visa, you should have shown the New I-797 Approval and the Officer @ POE would have given you the I-94 Valid until the New I-797, if they dont we have right to request to talk to their Supervisors.

    Anyway, its too late now and you have the following 3 Options:

    1. You can go any of the Customs And Border Protection deferred Inspection sites
    and get it corrected, refer to link below to go the site nearest to you.
    Also, it DOES NOT have to the same city where you entered US. You can
    go to any site.
    http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/contacts/deferred_inspection/

    2. You can go out of US and while entering back you should make sure you use the
    Latest Approval. You can go to Canada by Road and Come back.

    3. File for H1B Extension before June 2008 which is the Current I-94 date on your
    Passport

    Other Senior Members feel free to Add more Options.





    tattoo football boots nike mercurial 2010. Save: 42% off. Nike Mercurial football boots nike mercurial 2010. The new Nike Mercurial soccer
  • The new Nike Mercurial soccer



  • joshNJ
    06-29 12:06 PM
    if an A# is present in the I-140 receipt should that be used to fill the 485/EAD forms ?

    thanks



    more...


    pictures football boots nike mercurial football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly



  • rayoflight
    05-05 04:07 PM
    Wow that's a relief. I know you might have already done so just confirm the date until when the I-94 is issued and make a copy just in case.





    dresses Football Boots gt; Nike football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Superfly II FG Football
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Superfly II FG Football



  • delhiguy
    07-02 03:13 PM
    [QUOTE=vinabath]I paid for a 2007 labor for 15k. Now I am screwed.[/QUOTE

    One of my friend was gonna do the same(buying a labor is illegal) , I stopped him , He called me and thanked me...
    Never break rules , Never trust desi consultants...



    more...


    makeup football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly football boots nike mercurial 2010. Football Boots Nike MERCURIAL
  • Football Boots Nike MERCURIAL



  • sunny1000
    09-15 08:01 PM
    Chandu keeps opening the threads and keeps talking to himself....he is so lonely.

    He is trying to motivate people to go the rally...If you can't go or help in anyway, simply move on...don't whine about the threads...

    Thanks to Chandu and others for the motivation.





    girlfriend The new Nike Mercurial soccer football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly
  • football boots nike mercurial 2010. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly



  • admin
    06-02 07:01 AM
    My spouse's employer will apply for her H1B shortly (she is on F1 right now). Her passport expires in March 2007 but the Indian consulate does not allow you for a renewal earlier than 6 months of the expiration date.

    Does USCIS have any requirements for validity dates for passport when application for H1B is sent?

    I think USCIS will allow you to file for her H-1. BTW the H-1 quota is over for FY2007 - http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1039

    However if your wife has a Masters degree from the US she might still be able to apply.





    hairstyles football boots nike mercurial 2010. oots nike mercurial 2010, football boots nike mercurial 2010. football boots nike mercurial
  • football boots nike mercurial



  • martinvisalaw
    02-16 04:41 PM
    The cost varies, depending on the attorney fees and what advertising is done. Generally, it would probably cost $6000 - $12,000 for PERM. The employer must pay this, you cannot pay any of it.





    GCBy3000
    07-21 03:56 PM
    Hi,

    Thanks for contributing to our common cause if you have already done. If not, I would like your to contribute to IV. Every member in this forum has different issues and IV is working towards most of the issues.

    I got stuck in FBI name check for over 2+ years (24+ months)... run out of
    patience or anything :mad: . I now decide to sue them by filing writ of mandamus in court. I'd like to have an experienced attorney do it for me. I'm looking for an attorney who is responsible and responsive, has been successful in filing writ of mandamus for clients to get the name check moving. If you know/use any attorney like this, would you please let me know by emailing me or sending email to prof_risk at hotmail dot com, thanks a lot!

    I live in Maryland, I'd like the attorney to be located in great DC area.
    I really appreciate your help





    Libra
    09-15 08:26 PM
    so it means you are waiting for your amnesty right?:p

    Thread number 8 by Chandu......you must have filed under EB - "Too much time on my hands"



    No comments:

    Post a Comment